My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 07/12/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 07/12/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:51:08 PM
Creation date
8/5/2016 12:03:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
07/12/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26. Please elaborate on anything related to the Ramsey <br /> COR Development Plan. <br /> assistance <br /> children <br /> business <br /> appears <br /> lan, <br /> accessible activities <br /> W2P11 50 active <br /> apologies (bailingbusinesses city <br /> ard <br /> buildings apartments <br /> attempting <br /> Count Response <br /> 1 1.Safety needs to be prioritized,sight triangles,deeps to rmwater ponds accessible to small children.2."Mixed <br /> use"needs to be clearly defined for COR 1.It appears to be ignored. <br /> 1 A lot of that will depend upon how much land is used for surface parking vs.ramps,and how many buildings are <br /> single level vs.multi-level. <br /> 1 A restaurant or two and some weekend activities might draw people in.I'm sure that's in the works,but I'm sure <br /> it's hard to get businesses to invest if they don't see an immediate return. <br /> 1 1 am a brand new Board mem be r.As such,I am not versed enough to be able to answer these questions quite <br /> yet.Iwo uld prefer to have a little more exposure to the issues before attempting to answer these questions.My <br /> apologies. <br /> 1 1 really appreciate the invitation to have this plan reviewed by wide cross section of our community. <br /> 1 The City in general does not have substantial policies or plans to conserve water use,run-off,or our continued <br /> waters upplylong term.Given the recent evaluations of similar communities such as White Bear Lake,we <br /> should begin to evaluate our needs now before we fuIlydevelopthe city to ensure we don't need assistance in <br /> bailing outourwater infrastructure. <br /> 1 There needs to be a task force--asubgroup to the comp plan group--to look only at the COR. <br /> 1 We are going in the right direction.We need to continue to work with experienced professionals to guide the <br /> staff and commissions with our planning. <br /> 1 Wes hould keep our eye on making the COR des irablefor retail and business,so would like to see more m a rket <br /> rate housing/apartments of a quality that wilI draw in retailers.I also believe that senior or 50+housing and/or <br /> independent active senior apartments are needed and agap in our overall housing stock. <br /> 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.