My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Resolution - #16-05-105A - 07/21/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Resolutions
>
2016
>
Resolution - #16-05-105A - 07/21/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2025 1:43:23 PM
Creation date
8/12/2016 2:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions & Ordinances
Resolutions or Ordinances
Resolutions
Resolution or Ordinance Number
#16-05-105A
Document Date
07/21/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. That the Subject Property is located within the Shoreland Overlay District and abuts Ramsey <br />Terrace Pond, which is classified as a General Development Lake by the DNR and per City <br />Code Section 117-224 (Shoreland classification system and land use districts; shoreland <br />management). <br />9. That Section 117-225 (Shoreland Overlay District development standards) (f)(1) a. of City <br />Code establishes a minimum building setback of fifty (50) feet from the Ordinary High Water <br />(OHW) level of the lake. <br />10. That Section 117-111 (R-1 Residential District) of City Code establishes a front yard setback <br />of thirty (30) feet or the same as the principal structure, whichever is greater. <br />11. That the Applicants are proposing to construct a twenty-four foot by thirty foot (24' x 30') <br />detached accessory building on the Subject Property to provide additional storage space. <br />12. That the detached accessory building would be located twenty-five (25) feet from the OHW <br />of Ramsey Terrace Pond, which is a twenty-five (25) foot encroachment into the OHW <br />setback. <br />13. That the proposed location is outside the Shore Impact Zone, which is the most critical area <br />for ecological preservation. <br />14. That the detached accessory building would be located thirty-six (36) feet from the front lot <br />line, while the home is forty-five (45) feet from the front lot line. <br />15. That the proposed detached accessory building, aside from the location, would comply with <br />all other applicable standards. <br />16. That there is an approximate difference in elevation from the OHW to the location of the <br />detached accessory building of 1.8 feet; an updated survey will be required to verify this <br />vertical separation (Applicant may use fill to achieve compliance it if necessary). <br />17. That the Applicant has strategically located the accessory structure to minimize the visual <br />obstruction of the lake. <br />18. That the Applicant has strategically located the accessory structure to allow for tree <br />preservation and buffering, and only limited tree removal would be necessary to facilitate the <br />construction of the detached accessory building. <br />19. That the Applicant worked with staff to in an attempt to find a suitable location that balances <br />their needs with the provisions of City Code. <br />20. That Section 117-111 (R-1 Residential District) of City Code allows one (1) driveway per <br />property per street frontage in the MUSA district. <br />RESOLUTION #16-05-105A <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.