My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
07/07/87
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
07/07/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:47:20 AM
Creation date
6/14/2004 8:55:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
07/07/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
..,Continued from page 6 <br />riparian vegetation; increased water temperatures; wetlands <br />drainage and decreased aesthetic quality. <br /> A five man crew has been hired to do the work on the <br />Cottonwood River project. The crew consists of a heavy <br />equipment operator and four laborers. Equipment required <br />for the work includes: a tractor, backhoe or dozer; 2 - chain <br />saws, logging chains, steel cable, steel fence posts and lots <br />of elbow grease. <br /> Logs are pulled from the channel with the use of tog- <br />ging chains and a dozer. Once removed from the channel <br />the log piles are either burned or secured in an area away <br />from the immediate floodplain. If debris piles are left in the <br />flood plain, they are cabled down to prevent re-entry into <br />the stream during the next flood event. <br /> Preventative channel maintenance is performed during <br />the clear and snag phase. Unstable overhanging trees and <br />limbs are cut at the base, leaving the root structure to pro- <br />tect and the riverbank. Stable trees and limbs are left to <br />provide shade for the stream. Single logs, not considered a <br />significant obstruction to flow or to be a source of erosion, <br />are not removed from the channel but are left for fish and <br />wildlife habitat; <br /> .~Once the major log jams have been removed from <br />each river segment, the bank stabilization process is initi- <br />ated. Generally speaking, banks most suitable for tree top <br />protection are those' which are located on the outside curve <br />of a river meander where the current is being deflected into <br />the streambank. In situations such as this, a pointbar usually <br />forms directly opposite from the eroding bank (See Photo <br />#10). As the pointbar grows, increased erosive force is <br />applied to the opposite bank. <br /> Tree tops are placed along the eroding bank and an- <br />chored to it using steel cable anchored to steel fence posts <br />or any other fixed object. Live tree tops are preferable be- <br />cause of their greater resilience to damages associated with <br />impacts from flood flow. The protected bank acts to deflect <br />the current while the treetop structure slows the water ve- <br />locity in the immediate area, causing sediment to drop out <br />and eventually a sandbar to form, thus, "letting the river do <br />the work" (See Figure #2).. <br /> <br />TREE <br />TOPS <br /> <br />Eroded [ <br />Bankon POINT <br />Outside BAR <br />Curve <br /> <br />ANCHOR <br />POIt <br /> <br />FIGURE 2. <br />Application of <br />'3=almiter Method" <br /> <br />This schematic shows <br />a typical point bar <br />formeti~ directly <br />ol:)posite the outside <br />curve of the stream <br />meander. Proper <br />application of the <br />Palmiter Metho(t at the <br />opposite bank will <br />reduce bank erosion <br />and size of the point bar. <br /> <br />Trees are anchored <br />with cabte to I'ixe(:l points <br />on shore s~3 that <br />the"butts"of the tree <br />trunk face upstream. <br /> <br /> Placement of the treetop structures is critical, requlr- <br />lng a basic understanding of river hydraulics and more im- <br />portantly, field experience. If the structure is not located <br />properly, it may cause additional erosion problems. <br /> Following sandbar formation, the protected banks are <br />revegetated with cuttings from shrubs and trees indigenous <br />to the area. <br /> Work is usually done in the late summer or fall during <br />low flow conditions. The Cottonwood project was not <br />started until December of this past year due to our unusu- <br />ally wet fall. Conditions proved to be ideal this winter due <br />to mild temperatures and a lack of snowfall. Disturbance to <br />the banks and adjacent floodplain was negligible because of <br />frozen soils. <br /> Water resource planners and managers in southwest- <br />ern Minnesota will be closely monitoring the results of this <br />winters work. Interest is high because, ff successful, the <br />method being tested provides an economical and more envi- <br />rommentally acceptable means of restoring the flow of our <br />rivers and streams. <br /> Minnesota's streams and rivers have been a neglected <br />resource in the past. The rath of Dutch Elm disease in <br />combination with 5 to 7 years of higher than normal stream <br />flows have left hundreds of miles of river resource in a <br />clogged, obstructed condition. <br /> The Palrnlter Method has been used successfully in In- <br />diana, Ohio and North Carolina. In recent years Indiana, <br />alone, has spent over $1 million for projects using this <br />method. Another $910,000 in projects are now in the plan- <br />ning phase. <br /> Debra Chelm, River Planner for the Indiana Depart- <br />ment of Natural Resources has had lots of experience with <br />application of the methodology. Debra said in a recent in- <br />terview, 'some people have been lead to believe that the <br />method will reduce flooding. We feel that it (the Palmiter <br />Method) will lower the level of small, more frequent floods. <br />Major floods like the 25, 50 or 100 year floods will not be <br />impacted much.' <br /> When explaining the program to groups, Debra alludes <br />to the following benefits of this method of river restoration: <br /> · maintains or improves local drainage. <br /> · reduces channel bloc 'kage <br /> <br /> · reduces erosion and sedimentation <br /> · improves boating and canoeing conditions <br /> · improves aesthetic quality of the stream <br /> For more information concerning the Cottonwood <br />River Project contact Bob Finley, RCRCA Coordinator in <br />Redwood Falls (507) 637-2142 or Skip Wright, DNR Area <br />Hydrologist (507) 354-2196 in New Ulm. <br />Editor's Note: The author, Art (Skip) Wright is our Area <br /> Hydrologist in New Ulm. Skip has a Masters Degree <br /> in Water Science from the University of V}qsconsin, <br /> Stevens Point. Prior to starting with DNR, DOW in <br /> 1984, Skip worked for the Wyoming Department of <br /> Environmental Quality. <br /> <br />"Water Talk" is published by the Minnesota Depart- <br />ment of Natural Resources, Division of Waters. <br /> <br /> Editor: Bruce Sandstrom <br /> Graphic Arts: ,Jim R. Zicopula I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.