My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
07/07/87
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
07/07/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:47:20 AM
Creation date
6/14/2004 8:55:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
07/07/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Priorities <br /> <br /> Public policy choices that affect our <br />quality of life cannot be made intelli- <br />gently without setting spending prior- <br />ities. <br /> In 1981 and again in 1986, First <br />Banks polled the general public and <br />selected community leaders, asking <br />respondents to make hard choices in <br />key categories of public-sector spend- <br />ing. Provided with current public <br />spending totals in each category, <br />respondents were asked to reduce tax <br />spending for a list of selected services <br />by a total of l0 percent. <br /> Respondents were allowed to in- <br />crease or decrease spending within <br />each category--thus redistributing <br />resources according to their priori- <br />tie.~ but were required to end up <br />with an overall 10-percent decrease. <br /> Significantly, few respondents in <br />either group simply cut all categories <br />of spending by 10 percent. <br /> Notable differences existed in 1986 <br />between the public and leaders on the <br />importance of health, housing, admin- <br />istration and transportation. Public <br />respondents wanted to increase health <br />spending slightly; leaders wanted to <br />cut that category. The public chose to <br />more than double spending for hous- <br />ing, while leaders wanted to increase <br />it by one-third. And the public rated <br />transportation spending less impor- <br />tant than did leaders. <br /> Compared with 1981, both leaders <br />and the public rated housing, culture <br />and recreation as more important in <br />the 1986 survey. <br /> A cautionary note: comparisons be- <br />tween th~ 1981 and 1986 poll results <br />are difficult because a ninth spending <br />category, administration, was added <br />to the 1986 poll. Both leaders and the <br />public used that category to make sig- <br />nificant reductions, but the public cut <br />the category more than twice as much <br />as did leaders. <br /> The introduction of the adminis- <br />trative category in the 1986 poll may <br />account for another major difference <br />with the 1981 poll. In the 1981 poll, <br />both public and leaders made signifi- <br />cant cuts in spending for culture and <br />recreation. In the latest poll, both <br />groups left it unchanged. <br /> <br />1986 Budget Priorities Survey Results <br />~ Current ~ Commur~ty Leaders ~ General r-u~,~ic <br /> Education <br /> -5% <br /> <br />wv ~. Welfare & <br /> Employment <br /> Security <br /> ~m~ , <br /> I -13% <br /> · -15% <br />J ~! Transportation <br /> ig ',_,,;o ' <br /> ~ ~-17% <br /> I~ ~ Safe~ and Pollution Administratio~ <br /> <br /> . -9% <br /> <br />0 Health Culture and Housing <br /> Recreation <br /> <br />I I II <br /> <br />Personal vs. Community Priorities <br /> <br />II I <br /> <br /> Personal Priority <br />Lookin~g ahead $ or 10 years, which one <br />should be the top priority for improving <br />your personaI life7 <br /> <br /> Community Priority <br />Looking ahead $ or 10 years~ which one <br />should be the top priority for improving <br />the overall community quality of 1Lfe? <br /> <br />General Community General Community <br />Public Leaders Public Leaders <br /> <br />1. Education Education Education ~obs <br />2. Health Jobs Jobs Education <br />3. Jobs Culture Health Income/Welfare <br />4. Environment Environment Public Safety Public Safety <br />5. Public Safety Public Safety Income/Welfare Environment <br />6. Housing Participation Environment Transit <br />7. Income/Welfare Transit Housing Housing <br />8. Culture Health Transit Health <br />9. Transit Housing Participation Culture <br />10. Participation Income/Welfare Culture Participation <br /> <br />PAG' <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.