04/07/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1. That Mr. Gary Ostlund, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has applied for a conditional use permit to operate an electrical contracting business fr~m his own ~ in the R1-R l~ural Besidential District. 2. That the Applicant has appeared before the Planning and Zoning Cc~mission for a lmblic hearin~ pursuant to Section 170.013D of the City Code off April 7,1987 and that said public hearin~ was properly advertised and minutes of that public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. 3. That the property which is the subject of the applicatio~ is located at 14290 Alpaca Street N.W., which property is legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block 1, Alpaca Estates, 2nd Additi~, Anoka County, Minnescta 4. That the subject parcel is approximately 2.5 acres in size and is located in the R1-R Rural Residential District. 5. That an electrical contracting business is not a permitted use in the R1-R l~ural Residential District. 6. That the adjacent properties are zoned and used for single family residential development. 7. That the Applicant is proposing to operate his contracting business from the subject parcel and has stated that he is currently storing materials for this business in the garage at that property and is currently storing two vehicles for the business o~ the subject property. 8. That the proposed contracting business will increase traffic to the subject property. 9. That the proposed contracting business will be detrimental to persons living in the vicinity of the use as that is not a consistent use with the residential zoning. 10. That the proposed contracting business will substantially adversely impair the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties as it is not consistent with the residential intent of the zone. 11. That the proposed contracting business will not be harmonious with and in accordance with specific objectives of the City's Om~prehensive Plan. 12. That the proposed contracting business will be disturbing to existing and future neighboring residential uses. 13. That the proposed contracting business will not be a substantial improvement to property in the immediate vicinity. 14. That the proposed contracting use will be adequately served by essential public services.