Laserfiche WebLink
planning commission has become an advocate of a <br />certain interest group rather than representative of <br />the total community. <br /> <br /> Local planning commissions usually vary in size <br />from five to fifteen members. The County Plan- <br />ning Act specifically states that thc planning <br />commission must consist of from five to eleven <br />members. Fur.thermorc, not more than one of thc <br />members shall be an officer or employee of the <br />county and at least two members must reside in <br />the unincorporated portion of the county. The <br />Municipal Planning Act does not indicate a specific <br />number for a planning commission, presumably <br />leaving it to each community to determine for <br />itself the number of members of thc commission. <br /> <br /> In determining the size, consideration should be <br />made to obtain a representative .sample of the <br />citizens in the community, while at the same time <br />not making it so large as to make its operation <br />unwieldy. In general review of municipal ordi- <br />nances and resolutions, seven to nine members <br />were found to be the numbers that appeared most <br />often. A recent survey of counties showed that <br />most county planning commissions consist of <br />eleven members. In addition, the size may vary <br />depending on the degree of urbanization of the <br />community - a small, rural community may get <br />along with, or desire, a smaller planning com- <br />mission than a large, urbanized community. <br /> <br />B. POWERS OF A PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br /> Under Minnesota state enabling legislation, a <br />local planning commission is advisory in nature; <br />that is, advisory to the county board, city council <br />or town board. The major exception to this is <br />that counties may, if they so choose, designate the <br />commission as the final authority on conditional <br />use permits, and some counties have elected to do <br />so. Thus, the planning commission cannot make <br />binding di~cisions for the county, city, or township <br /> it can only recommend that certain actions be <br />taken by the elected officials. The elected officials <br />in their deliberations, however, should carefully <br />consider the recommendations of the planning <br />commission. Unfortunately, in some communities <br />the local elected officials fail to consider properly <br />the recomq~endations of the planning commission <br />or consistently overrele its recommendations. The <br />result is often a loss of interest, resignations, and <br />high turn-over rate among planning commission <br />members which usually adversely affects the whole <br />planning process.' <br /> <br />-10- <br /> <br />C. FUNCTIONS OF A PLANNII~IG COMMISSION <br /> <br /> The major function .of a planning commission is <br />to o~sist the local officials in developing, reviewing <br />and analyzing programs and development pro- <br />posals. The time demands on local officials from a <br />variety of matters related to community.affairs-is <br />usually so heavy that the officials have little time <br />to devote to planning and development matters. <br />Consequently, the planning commission can <br />usually provide a more careful review of planning <br />programs and development proposals and give <br />valuable advice to the local officials. <br /> <br /> A second major function of the planning com- <br />mission is to educate the local officials on planning <br />and development matters. This is a valuable, <br />but often overlooked, function of a planning <br />commission. A planning commissioner who takes <br />his or her responsibility seriously often learns <br />much about planning and development concepts <br />and standards in frequent contacts with developers <br />and technical planning and engineering staffs. This <br />information can and should be passed on to local <br />officials at regular meetings established between <br />the local officials and the planning commissioners <br />or through written communications in formally <br />reviewing planning programs and development <br />proposals. <br /> <br /> Since the chief duty of a planning commission is <br />to assist the elected local officials in the decision- <br />making process, the planning process must be <br />relevant both to day-to-day issues as well as the <br />long-range issues, and a proper balance must be <br />established between the two. The long-range <br />policies are needed to establish the framework for <br />the day-to-day decisions to bring about a properly <br />coordinated approach to planning and develop- <br />ment. On the other hand, the planning com- <br />mission must also be prepared to assist the local <br />officials in the short-range, day-to-day issues in a <br />practical manner. <br /> <br /> <br />