03/03/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

size and meets the minim~n size requir~nents for a total of 6 lots. The Commission is reluctant to even oonsider the plat as proposed without input fr~m the County f~lgineer. The Commission recommended that Mr. Menkveld redr~,' the plat with a cul-de- sac configuration and if the County Engineer is approached, inquire as to the appropriate amount of right-of-way that should be aoquired in the event of upgrading to Cty. Rd. #63. The Com~ssion also requested input from Poli~ Chief Auspos regarding this particular stretch of Cty. Rd. 963 and his opinion with respect to allying 3 more accesses onto it. Review R1-U Residential Zoning: Case Of Mr. Sidney Schaumberg: Mr. Schau~erg was present and stated that in 1981 he specifically purchased a sufficient amount of land to develop as an ingress/egress with additional one acre lots to access his 80 acre parcel to the east, which was zoned Urban Residential and required a minimum lot size of one acre. With the city's recent rezoning, the larger parcel was designated to R1-U and developable with one acre lots; the strip of property accessing the 80 acres was designated R1-R with a minimum lot size of 2-1/2 acres. Mr. Schaumberg is reguesting that the city rezone that strip of property to Ri-U in order that he can develop that and the 80 acre parcel as originally intended. Chairman i~terson inquired if the Commission should give consideration to rezoning just Mr. Schaumberg's property or rezoning all property within the general urban area, not just the 1990 urban area, to R1-U. ~btion by Commissioner Shumway to proceed with appropriate processes to rezone that strip of property o~ned by Mr. Sidney Schaumberg and located outside the 1990 Urban Area but within the Urban Area frcm R1-R to R1-U. Further Discussion: Chairman Peterson noted that rezonin9 for Mr. Schaumberg's case only or rezoning all urban areas to R1-U, will require a public hearing. Consensus was to address Fg. Schat~berg's property only at this time. Commissioner Deemer noted that the property would still not be developable until it fronts on a public street. Commissioner Zimmerman seconded the motion. Further Discussion: Commissioner Deemer stated that he feels it is incorrect for the city to go through the expense of rezoning a s~all piece of property based on speculation when historical data backs Mr. Schaumberg's claim to develop that strip of property with one acre lots. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Shumway, Zimmerman, Hendriksen, LaDue and []~well. Voting No: Commissioner Deemer. It was noted that in the historical records no specific mention of One acre lots was made; it was suggested that Ms. Norris get input fr~ the Council P & Z/February 3, 1987 Page 7 of 10