Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Mayor Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to adopt <br />Kesolt~tion f:$7-248 ap?roving payment of bills for the month ef October, <br />1987. (Please refer to resc, lution file for Resolution <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: )~ayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Co×, <br />DeLuca and Pearsor~. Vo~ing No: None. <br /> <br />~ ~Case ~9 - Statu~ Of Ice Ei:J~ ¥!oodin? For ]987/1988: <br /> <br />Mayor Reimznn stated that the updated cost to retrofit the tanker truck to <br />accomodate ice rink flooding and various fire department uses is $5600. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley referred to earlier concerns expressed regarding the <br />retrofitting and stated that a pressure pump is necessary because more <br />pregs~re than gravity can provide is needed to spray an even ice. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to <br />authorize retrofitting of the tanker truck by Determan Welding and Tank <br />Service at the original bid price of $5258.00. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Sorteberg and Pearson. Voting No: Kone. <br /> <br />Case ~5: Case ~]] .r Solid Waste Activities - Policy Review; <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that pursuant to Council direction, he researched <br />resolutions on file by Council relating to landfills and solid <br />activity. The two resolutions found do not establish a policy of <br />forbidding any business that might be involved in solid ~'aste type of <br />activities. Mr. ~artley inquired as to Council's recollection of <br />discussions and intent at the time these resolutions were adopted. <br /> <br />Counci!member DeLuca noted that the November 6, 1985 minutes reference the <br />proposed I{SP facility in Elk River; as a member of the audience that <br />evening he recalls council discussing ~hether or not such a facility <br />be desired in P~msey; the consensus ~'as that Council ~'as not in favor of <br />encouraging any landfill related businesses in Ramsay. <br /> <br />Mr. Eartley stated that the two resolutions state that Council opposes the <br />establishment of Site P as a landfill site and expansion of the existing <br />facility. <br /> <br />Ccunciimember Cox stated that based cn the reso!uticns, Council ca~ <br />consider abatement related businesses. <br /> <br />Counci!member Cox referred to %'~aste ~lanagement of Yin~escta, inc.~s <br />proposal far verti.~al e~pansion of the existing landfill an~2 nhe end use of <br />the landfill being a £ki hill; regulating agencies have ruled that <br />deve!o~ent of a si~i kill is feasi~ia. Counci!mer_?~er Cox ai~o noteg that <br />Waste .~'anagement condua~e~ a survey at the recent business expo and 94% cf <br />the people respondir~g ~'ere in fever of a ski kill as an end use of the <br />landfill. Counailmember Cox stated that time is getting short far <br />City Council/October 20, !987 <br /> <br /> <br />