My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08/12/87
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1987
>
08/12/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2026 9:50:15 AM
Creation date
6/17/2004 11:46:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
08/12/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember DeLuca stated that he is in favor of perimeter frost footings <br />and feels they are a necessity in commercial and industrial areas. <br />Case r5: Adopt Or! ! . !ce AdoRting 1985• u Building CodeAnd 1987 <br />State BuildiiigCode: <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />adopt Ordinance #87-3 adopting the 1985 Uniform Building Code and 1987 <br />State Building Code. <br />Further Discussion: Building Official Erickson stated that both of the <br />codes have minor changes in them; the UBC has a fee schedule change; both <br />the SBC and UBC require charging 65% of the building permit fee for plan <br />check versus the flat $30 rate currently charged for residential permits. <br />Mr. Erickson stated that he recommends continuing with the 1979 fee <br />schedule and increasing the plan review fees to 45% of the building permit <br />fee and gradually work up to the 65% figure. Councilmember Cox inquired if <br />the State is mandating these increases. Mr. Erickson replied that the <br />State is not mandating the change in fee schedules but is requiring that <br />plan checks be charged at a rate that is 65% of the building permit fee. <br />Council expressed concern with the increase to the plan review fee, <br />especially in situations where there is construction of several units <br />identical in structural design but the plan review fee is charged several <br />times and real effort was only put into the initial of those plan reviews. <br />The City Attorney recommended that Ramsey begin charging at a rate <br />c o m p a r a b l e t o w h a t o t h e r c i t i e s a r e c h a r g i n g. <br />Councilmembers Cox and Sorteberg restated their motion as follows: <br />Notion by Councilmember Cox, and <br />seconded by Councilmember <br />Sorteberg to <br />adopt Ordinance #87-3 <br />adopting <br />the <br />1985 Uniform Building <br />Code and 1987 <br />State Building Code <br />and further, <br />to retain the 1979 fee <br />schedule and <br />increase plan review <br />fees to 45% <br />of <br />the building permit fee. <br />(Please refer <br />t o o r d i n a n c <br />e f i l e <br />f <br />o r O r d i n a n c e <br />f 8 7 - 3 ). <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br />Case #6: Request For Conditional Use Permit To Use A Temporary <br />Structure For Office Space To Sell Automobiles In The B-1 <br />Business District: Case Of Mr. Larry Rudesil_l: <br />Mr. Rudesill was present and Ms. Norris stated that he is requesting a <br />conditional use permit to use a temporary structure for office space to <br />sell automobiles at 7009 Hwy. #10; auto sales is a permitted use in this <br />area. The Police department has recommended obtaining a letter from the <br />State stating that the temporary structure meets requirements for permanent <br />office space required by State statute. <br />Motion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Pearson. to <br />City Council/June 23, 1987 <br />Page 13 of 19 <br />\A3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.