03/26/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1. ~at Mr. 3ohn Myzdal~ bereinafte£ to ze£e£red to as 'Applicant'~ has properly applied for a Board of i%djustment variance from the Mississippi River setback o 2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing p~rsuant to Section 170.0L12G cf the City Code c~ March 26, 1987 and that said tmblic hearing was properly advertised and the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part (If these findings by reference. 3. That the subject property is generally known as 14600 Bowers Drive N.W. and is legally described as follows: Lots 18 and 19, except the southeasterly sixty feet of said Lot 19, as measured at r!.ght angles to the southeasterly line of said Lot 19, Bowers Mississippi Acres, Anoka County, Minnesota, subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any. 4. That the subject property is located in the R-1R Rural Residential District. 5. That the subject property is located in the Critical River Overlay District. 6. That Section 170.0112G of the City Code requires a minimum setback frem the Mississippi River of two-hundred feet frcm the ordinary high water mark. 7. That the Applicant is proposing a setback frcm the river of one-hundred and thirty feet and is requesting a variance to the two-hundred foot setback requir~ment. 8. That the Applicant's variance requires ~ approval due to its location in the Critical River Overlay District. 9. That the Applicant tins met with Mr. Joan Stine, DNR, conce.~ning this variance request. Mr. Stine has ccemented that he has no ~bjectlon to the Applicant' s request. 10. That the Appli~ has stated that there are unique oomfitions applying to the property in question; r~.ly, the river, the topography of the lot and the lot size, that do not apply generally to other properties in the R-IR District. 11. That the Applicant has stated that such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights similar to those possessed by other properties in the R-IR Residential District. 12. That the special conditions do not result fr~m the action of the 13. That if the variance is granted, the variance will not allow the Applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other owners of lands in the R-iR Residential District.