08/27/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

, , PI~OPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT HR o ~D¥ TRIEHERT 1. That Mr. Randy Triemert, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance from Sections 170.015F and 170.016A of the City Code regarding setback from thoroughfares. 2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to Section 170.013G of the Ramsey City Code on-August 27, 1987 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as part of these findings by reference. 3. That the subject property is generally known as 17350 St. Francis Blvd. N.W. and is legally described as follows: Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 27, Anoka County, Minnesota. 4. That the subject property is located in the R-iR Rural Residential District and is approximately .56 acres in size. 5. That Sections 170.015F and 170.016A of the City Code require a minimum setback of 110 feet from the centerline of thoroughfares. 6. That the Applicant had a home on the subject property located approximately 93 feet from the centerline of St. Francis Blvd. 7. That the Applicant's home was constructed prior to the adoption of the requirement of the 110 foot setback from thoroughfares. 8. That more than 50% of the Applicant's home was destroyed by fire in 1986. 9. That Section 170.015H of the City Code requires all nonconforming uses that are more than 50% destroyed to conform to the current City Code. 10. That the Applicant is proposing to reconstruct his house on the site of the original structure. 11. That the Applicant is requesting a variance of approximately 17 feet from the required setback from the centerline of St. Francis Blvd. 12. That there are unique circumstances applying to the Applicant's property, namely, that the original house on the subject property was constructed prior to the adoption of the setback requirements. 13. That the Applicant has stated that the variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right, namely, the right to reconstruct his house on his property. 14. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Appl ic ant. 15. That if granted, the variance will not grant the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Chapter to other owners of lands in the R-1R Residential District.