09/24/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT ~. RONALD FISCHL 1. That Mr. Ronald Fischl, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," has applied for a Board of Adjustment variance from Sections 170.015F and 170.016A of the City Code regarding setback from thoroughfares. 2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to Section 170.013G of the Ramsey City Code on September 24, 1987 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as part of these findings by reference. 3. That the subject proeprty is generally known as 15850 St. Francis Boulevard N.W. and is legally described as follows: The South 450 feet of the North 516 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying West of the centerline of State Trunk Highway 47. 4. The the subject proeprty is located in the R-iR Rural Residential district and is approximately 9.2 acres in size. 5. That the adjacent properties are also located in the R-IR Rural Residential district. 6. That the Applicant is constructing an above ground swimming pool which is located approximately 85 feet from the centerline of St. Francis Boulevard N.W. and which is located in the front yard of the subject property. 7. That Sections 170.015F and 170.016A of the City Code require all structures to be located at least one hundred ten feet from the centerline of major thoroughfares. 8. That Section 170.015G of the City Code requires detached accessory structures to be located in side or rear yards. 9. That the Applicant is requesting a 25 foot variance to construct the above-ground swimming pool in the required setback from St. Francis Boulevard. 10. That the Applicant is requesting a variance to construct a detached accessory structure, an above-ground sw~,~ing pool, in his front yard. 11. That the Applicant has stated that the swimming pool is a temporary structure. 12. That there are not unique or exceptional circumstances applying to the subject property. 13. That if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Chapter of the City Code to other property owners in the R-1R Residential district.