Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Cox irguired if a covenants for this kind of P.U.D. would <br />conflict with the existing city ordinances. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich replied that ordinance will all~. the occupations in this area <br />but the hemes would require conditional use permits because they are non- <br />permitted uses on industrial property. <br /> <br />Councilm~r Cox stated that this area might be desireable for such a <br />development as it would serve as a buffer in an area where industrial and <br />residential zones meet. Councilmember Cox stated that he is willing to <br />seriously consider Phase I of this P.U.D. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich suggested that the developer prepare performance standards for <br />the area that would address noise, hours of operation, types of home <br />occupations all~ed, etc. <br /> <br />Councilmsmber DeLuca stated that he feels the P.U.D. is worth considering <br />because it would serve as a buffer where residential and industrial zones <br />meet. He would like to see language incorporated into the convenants that <br />would produce a self-policing affect. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson stated that he likes the idea of a residential <br />develolm~=_nt with home occupations and it should be workable if proper <br />policing methods are built into the covenants. <br /> <br />Councilm~ber Sorteberg stated that he likes the idea of an area zoned for <br />hue occupations. <br /> <br />Order Feasibility Study On Municipal State Aid Project For <br /> FQr 167th Avenue N.W.: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilm~mber Cox and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />adept Resolution 987-51 ordering the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility <br />study to upgrade 167th Avenue N.W. from Nowthen Blvd. N.W. to Jaspar Street <br />N.W. to ~A standards. (Please refer to resolution file for Resolution 987- <br />51). <br /> <br />Motion.carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Co~ncilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case 916-. Report From Road And Bridge Committee: <br /> <br />a) Public Works Property; b) One-Ton Truck; c) Light Equipment O~erator - <br /> <br />At the January 27 Council meeting, the Road and Bridge Committee was <br />directed to review the need for a one-ton truck, a light equipment operator <br />and a public works site. <br /> <br />Councilmsmber Cox stated that there was sc~e discussion last year regarding <br />privatization of the public works department and that has not been followed <br />up. Councilmember Cox suggested that rather than purchasing expensive <br />equipment for seasonal use, the City look into purchasing used equipment or <br />contracting equipment and operators during those times; if the city ceases <br />purchasing additional equipment, no additional public works property will <br /> <br />Page 15 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />