Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Jeffrey, Shepherd; Van <br />Scov and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Brauer. · · <br /> <br />Case #2: Request for an Interim Use Permit to Allow for O.utdoorStorage as a <br /> Principal Use in the E-1 Employment District; Case.of Norad Loab.nch <br /> <br />Associate Pla~er Wald advised Nohad [oabnch of Metro:Efi~iro~;~ntal Site Se~ices Inc. <br />submitted an application for an Intehm Use Pe~it to all~:~ for outdoor storage of constmctionS~? <br />trailers and boxes as a phncipal use on the property 1.orated off of 156th Avenue situated <br />West Radium Industrial Park. She noted this is at ~eSorder of ~sey and Elk River. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated Mr. Loabnch's p;°pe~ ~:: approxi~'~:~'~lY ~o a~es ~ size and is <br />zoned E-I Employment. She indicated the applicant ownS:TM~etro Enviro~ental Site Sewices' <br />Inc., which requires storage of t~ee constmction boxes an'd;::.t~ee trailers. CiU Code states <br />outside storage of equipment is pe~ined with the issuance 0f g~:;condition~; use pemt. She <br />stated the applicant decided to apply for an interim use pe~it due:to ~e...~fact that he does not <br />plan on utilizing the subject pmPe~,for outside storage as a pdnciP'ai?:~se for the life of the <br />prope~y. ' <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald advised th~: subject : "':{~:Su~ounded by prope~ies that are zoned . prope~ <br />E-i, B-2 and Pla~ed Unit Development. ~e proposed a~e: Will. have minimal impact to ~e <br />prope~y since the applicant does not need to utilize the :eqUipment on a daily basis. She stated <br />the construction boxes and trailers are brought to a project site and le~ at the site until the project <br />is complete, Which' ranges from t~ee weeks to several months. She indicated the equipment <br />would then be transpoaed back to the RamSey parcel until the sta~ of another project. <br /> <br />Associate Pla~er Wald'~xplained the interim ese pe~it request is for a maximum of four years. <br />Staff is recommending that.the applicant be required to install Class 5, at least ~o inches in <br />depth, and store the equipment within 'the surfaced area in a neat and orderly ma~er. She <br />indicated Staff is recommending approval with the conditions outlined. <br /> <br />Public Input <br /> . <br /> <br />Kevin Ly~es stated he 0~s the prope~y due east, which is Lot 1, Block 1. He indicated they <br />are cu~enfly using the prope~y for this pu~ose, and he ale~ed the CiU to that fact. He stated he <br />built a nice building, and spent a lot of money, with the understanding t~s was ~ indus~al <br />park, not trailer storage. He indicated the applicant is parking cars on the street as well. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynnes indicated he does not think Class 5 is fair when he had to spend $56,000 for asphalt, <br />and $10,000 for curb, not to mention planting trees and shrubs. He stated they have paid <br />$106,000 to meet City requirements, and pay $30,000 a year in taxes. He indicated he has done <br />everything to meet the City requirements, but is surrounded with junk. He expressed that his <br />property value is depreciating. He stated they were told the city was cleaning up Highway 10, <br />but he is still surrounded by junk. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 3, 2004 <br /> Page 4 of 18 <br /> <br />-151- <br /> <br /> <br />