My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/18/87
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1987
>
02/18/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2025 11:48:19 AM
Creation date
6/22/2004 1:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
02/18/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmsnber DeLuca stated that his reason would be a matter of personality <br />~o.fli~t. <br /> <br />Mr. Sht~nway asked who the personality conflict would be with. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca stated that the personality conflict would be with <br />himself. <br /> <br />Mr. Sh~ay stated that he has seen Mr. DeLuca and Mr. ~-amer at same meetings <br />and never witnessed the two of th~m having words. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca stated that he didn't say he and Mr. Deemer have had <br />words. <br /> <br />Councilm~mber Cox stated that he didn't second the motion to reappoint Mr. <br />Deener because it wouldn't hurt to have some new blood on the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission. Councilmember Cox stated that in many respects, he doesn't <br />agree with Mr. Deemer at all. Councilm~nber COx stated that Council is elected <br />by the public and if the public doesn't like his decisions, they can vote him <br />out of office. Planning and Zoning is not elected and action regarding the <br />Planning and Zoning Ccm~nission on the public's behalf ~ust take place through <br />his vote at the Council table. Councilmember Cox expressed respect for the <br />commission members being present on Mr. ~amer's behalf but noted that nobody <br />would have to be speaking for Mr. Deemer had he been doing his job. <br />Councilmember Cox stated that he is not in favor of Mr. Deemer's reappointment. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann stated he is a patriotic person and he noticed at a Council <br />meeting that Mr. Deemer did not take off his hat during the Pledge to the Flag. <br />Mayor Reimann stated that he gets reports back from people stating that Mr. <br />Deemer seems to be taking it upon himself to be the Building Inspector; <br />somebody representing Ramsey should be informed as to what he should and should <br />not be doing. Mr. Deemer seems to be getting into issues that don't involve <br />him. Mr. Deemer can bring his concerns up for discussion at Planning and <br />Zoning meetings but he should not take it upon himself to act as the City's <br />Building Official. <br /> <br />Mr. Shm~way stated that in order to be better informed on cases coming before <br />them, all of the Commission members try to inspect the subject properties. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann stated that he also used to inspect subject properties when he <br />served on Planning and Zoning but Mr. ~-mer oversteps his boundaries and he is <br />representing Ramsey when he does those kinds of things. <br /> <br />Mr. Shut, ay stated that he feels Council is singling out Mr. De~mer because he <br />justifiably called a local business owner on the carpet; eyeD/thing Mr. Deemer <br />did was legal and everything that business owner did was illegal. Mr. Deemer <br />is being singled out because he did not go with the flow and did what he <br />thought was right. <br /> <br />Mr. Deemer requested that Mayor Reimann point out specific instances where he <br />overstepped boundaries and acted as the Building Official. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann stated that he can't get into specifics. <br /> <br /> city council/January 6, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.