My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 07/26/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2016
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 07/26/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:23:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2016 4:19:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
07/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Police Chief Katers stated that sometimes there are updates to State or U.S. Supreme Court <br />Rulings and stated that the department asked for those updates and those have been provided. <br />He stated that the City also receives one on one work with officers when they must testify in <br />court. He stated that a majority of the cases are resolved prior to trial and they do seek the input <br />of the department when needed. He stated that there are also some prosecutions regarding <br />community development, such as ordinance violations, and the prosecutor's office provides <br />service for those laborious cases as well. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked if the City has a set prosecutor or whether multiple attorneys <br />handle the caseload. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that the contract is through the firm and does not list a specific <br />attorney, noting that based upon availability sometimes the firm has contracted with another firm <br />to provide service. He advised that the City has not seen any change in the level of service <br />received. He noted that if a case is going to trial, a more experienced litigator will handle the <br />case. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that the City has had a lengthy history with this firm and asked <br />why the City is not interested in obtaining a three-year contract at this time rather than just a one- <br />year extension. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that this would allow the City to stagger the dates and allow the City <br />to go through the RFP process the next year, rather than going through that process for both the <br />civil and criminal attorneys as those are split between different firms. He stated that in this case <br />the three-year mark has been hit and would recommend a one-year extension, then going out for <br />an RFP next year before the contract expires to determine if the City is receiving the best <br />available services. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the rates are satisfactory and are probably on the low end <br />and service is also satisfactory. <br />Councilmember Johns stated that this proposal seems to make sense as it would allow that <br />additional time. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau asked the purpose of going out for RFP next July and stated that <br />perhaps the City is comfortable with the level of service and rate and extend the contract out for <br />three years, going through RFP at that time. <br />Councilmember Shryock agreed that if the City is satisfied with the service and price she would <br />also agree with extending the contract out two to three years, which would still create that <br />stagger. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he has no problem testing the waters through RFP, as it keeps <br />people honest. <br />City Council Work Session / July 26, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.