My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/02/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/02/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:32 AM
Creation date
8/26/2016 4:31:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/02/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
screening of the developed area farther back from the shore. Within it, restrictions apply to the placement and size <br />of structures, vegetation removal and shoreland alterations (grading and filling). The City, however, does not <br />specify a setback requirement for the Shore Impact Zone. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all property owners within 350 feet from the Subject Property via U.S Mail and a notice of <br />Public Hearing was also published in the Anoka UnionHerald, the City's official newspaper. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Variance Proposal <br />The Applicant is proposing to construct a 720 square foot accessory structure within the fifty (50) foot Ordinary <br />High Water (OHW) setback (A), as well as the forty-five (45) foot front lot line setback (B), and to provide access <br />to the structure from Neon St. NW through a secondary driveway (C). <br />A. The Shoreland Overlay District requires structures to maintain a fifty (50) foot setback from the Ordinary <br />High Water (OHW) line, per City Code Section 117-225 (f) (1) a. In the location proposed, the structure is <br />encroaching approximately twenty-one (21) feet into that setback, at an estimated distance of twenty-nine <br />(29) feet from the OHW line. Details of the relation of the proposed location to the OHW line are provided in <br />Table 1, below. <br />Distance from OHW <br />Change in Elevation <br />Southwest corner <br />28 feet* <br />12.1 feet* <br />Southeast corner <br />30 feet* <br />Between 1.1 and 2 feet* <br />Average <br />29 feet* <br />1.8 feet* <br />Required by Code <br />50 feet <br />** <br />Requested Deviation <br />21 feet* <br />2.2 feet** <br />Table 1. Relation of the Proposed Location to the OHW Line. <br />*Distances and elevation changes are estimated by staff, based off of the information provided in the Certificate of <br />Survey completed May 2nd, 2016, that was submitted by the Applicant in support of the original proposal. The <br />revised proposal does not, however, provide the level of accuracy featured in the original proposal. <br />**As a point of reference: If applicant were able to locate the structure 50 feet from the OHW line, thus meeting the <br />setback requirement, there would be an estimated total of four (4) feet of change in elevation between the OHW and <br />the structure. <br />B. As outlined in City Code Section 117-111, accessory structures are required to be thirty (30) feet from the <br />front lot line, or the same distance as the home (whichever is greater). In the case of this proposal, the home is <br />located forty-five (45) feet from the front lot line. The proposed location for the accessory structure provides <br />a distance of 33.5 feet between the structure and the front lot line, which encroaches a total of 11.5 feet into <br />the distance required by City Code. <br />C. The Applicant is also requesting a variance from the maximum number of driveways allowed. The R-1 <br />Residential District (MUSA) standard currently allows for one (1) driveway per street frontage. The intent of <br />this standard, at least in part, is to control costs associated with street reconstruction projects. The Applicant <br />proposes to construct a second driveway that would allow access to the structure from Neon St. NW. The <br />surface area proposed for the driveway has not been provided. <br />Additional Application Considerations <br />The Applicant has stated that the proposed location allows for the preservation of several trees located in the <br />wooded area where the structure is proposed, as the site is within an existing clearing. A significant limitation of <br />the property, as noted by the Applicant, concerns topography. Siting the structure within the lawn area near the <br />home (outside of all setbacks and easements) would require "excessive fill" or would result in an "unmanageable <br />driveway"- and could be considered out of character with the neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.