Laserfiche WebLink
DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL RESOURCES <br />Shoreland & Floodplain <br />Variance Guidance Series <br />OHWL Setbacks <br />This is one of a series of examples developed as guidance for considering variance requests along <br />lakes and rivers. Consult your local shoreland, floodplain, and river -related ordinances. <br />Why are setbacks from the OHWL important? <br />The Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) is a dynamic area of high biodiversity and ecological function, <br />as well as the regulatory line that separates local land use and state public waters jurisdictions. Setbacks <br />from the OHWL are established in statewide rules and administered through local ordinances to ensure <br />adequate spacing between structures and public waters to <br />protect against runoff and pollution, and to preserve the natural <br />shoreline. Local governments have limited discretion to deviate <br />from - or grant a variance to - a required setback. They may do <br />so only if all of the variance criteria established in state statutes <br />and their local ordinances are met. In evaluating such requests, <br />local governments must examine the facts, determine whether <br />all statutory and local criteria are satisfied, and develop findings <br />to support the decision. If granted, local governments may <br />impose conditions to protect resources. An example OHWL <br />variance request, with considerations, is provided below. <br />Example OHWL Setback Variance Request <br />A property owner requests a variance to construct a 1000 square foot <br />addition on an existing home on a lake. The proposed addition would <br />be located 75 feet from the OHWL of the lake instead of 100 feet as <br />required by the local shoreland ordinance. The property owner claims <br />that the addition is needed to provide extra space for a growing <br />family, that it will improve the value and appearance of the property, <br />and that there is no other reasonable location on the property due to <br />the design of the home and an adjacent wetland. <br />M+nimum <br />Structure <br />Setback <br />150' <br />Considerations for Findings <br />A good record and findings help keep communities out of lawsuits and help them prevail if they fmd <br />themselves in one. In evaluating the facts and developing findings for this variance request, all of the <br />following statutory criteria must be satisfied, in addition to any local criteria: <br />• Is the variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinance? <br />Considering a variance request is a balancing test that requires weighing the need of an individual <br />property owner against the purposes of the local shoreland regulations - in this case a setback from <br />the OHWL - for protecting public waters. Statewide Shoreland Management Rules establish structure <br />setbacks from the OHWL for several reasons, including but not limited to managing the effects of <br />shoreland crowding, preventing pollution of surface water, and maintaining property values and <br />natural characteristics of shorelands. These regulations are implemented through local ordinances. <br />Considerations: What are the purposes of the OHWL setback as established in the local shoreland <br />ordinance what is it intended to prevent or protect? Will deviating from the required OHWL <br />setback on this property undermine the purposes and intent? Why or why not? <br />• Is the variance consistent with the comprehensive plan? <br />The local comprehensive plan establishes a framework for achieving a community's vision for the <br />future. Most plans contain goals and policies for protecting natural resources and shorelands, as well <br />as maps that identify areas of high risk or with high ecological value where development should be <br />avoided. The variance request must be considered with these goals and policies in mind. Maps should <br />be consulted to determine if the property is within any areas identified for protection. <br />Considerations: Which goals and policies apply? Is allowing structural encroachment within the <br />OHWL setback area on this property consistent with these goals and policies? Why or why not? <br />r <br />Page 1 of 2 Variance Guidance Series — OHWL Setback, Updated 10/10/2012 <br />