Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin April 25, 2016 I Volume 10 I Issue 8 <br />whelming concern about the change of zoning" from nearby residents and <br />concerns of "what would be happening behind the fence as far as law <br />enforcement" after business hours. <br />The Shaws appealed the Parish Council's denial of their rezoning <br />request. The trial judge denied the Shaws' request for reversal of the <br />Council's denial. The trial judge found that the Council's decision was "re- <br />lated to the general welfare of the public and was not arbitrary or <br />capricious." In so finding, the trial judge considered the opponents' <br />concerns about law enforcement safety following the fence installation, as <br />well as their concerns of "commercial creep" into their residential <br />neighborhoods. <br />The Shaws again appealed. <br />DECISION: Judgment of district court affirmed. <br />The Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit, affirmed the judgment <br />of the trial court, upholding the Parish Council's denial of the Shaws' <br />rezoning application. <br />In its decision, the court explained that the Parish Council's decision <br />would only be overturned if the Shaws could prove that the Parish <br />Council's action in denying the rezoning application was arbitrary and <br />capricious. The court found that the denial was not arbitrary and capricious <br />or taken "without reason," but rather was "reasonable under the <br />circumstances." <br />The court explained that the "concerns and desires of the electorate are <br />appropriate considerations in the decision making process on zoning." <br />Thus, the court found that the Parish Council appropriately considered and <br />gave weight to the opinion of the neighborhood association and the other <br />residents of the area. "Considering the entirety of the record and the great <br />deference given to the Council in zoning decisions," the court found that <br />the trial court had correctly found that the Parish Council's denial of the <br />Shaws' application for rezoning was "rationally related to the general <br />welfare of the Parish and was not arbitrary and capricious." <br />See also: Jenniskens v. Parish of Jefferson, 940 So. 2d 209 (La. Ct. App. <br />5th Cir. 2006), writ denied, 949 So. 2d 425 (La. 2007). <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />NATIONWIDE <br />The United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and <br />Transportation recently approved legislation Senate Bill 2658 (the "FAA <br />Reauthorization Bill") which "carries with it the opportunity for the <br />Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to trump state and local drone laws <br />with pre-emptive language." Under the bill, "state and local governments <br />©2016 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />