|
SELECT BULK STANDARDS FOR TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD
<br />AND GREEN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICTS
<br />TN-1&TN-2Traditional GN-i GN-2
<br />Neighborhood Low Density Medium Density
<br />Housing Conditions Well -maintained
<br />Minimum Lot Size
<br />4,500-9,000
<br />square feet
<br />Lot Coverage 35-5o%
<br />Maximum, Accessory
<br />Structure Allowance
<br />600-80o square feet
<br />Less Stable More Stable
<br />15,00o square feet
<br />(three traditional lots)
<br />5,00o square feet
<br />(one traditional lot)
<br />20% 5o%
<br />1,00o square feet 80o square feet
<br />to adjacent home values, neighborhood stabil-
<br />ity, and public safety is significant. The master
<br />plan provided a wide range of potential agricul-
<br />ture and open space strategies for repurposing
<br />vacant lots and stabilizing adjacent properties.
<br />In translating this master plan policy to a zon-
<br />ing regulation, the zoning ordinance establish-
<br />es urban agriculture and community garden as
<br />permitted uses for both the GN-i and GN-2 dis-
<br />tricts. It is important to note that by indicating
<br />these uses are permitted as -of -right, the zoning
<br />ordinance permits properties to be solely oc-
<br />cupied by agricultural uses as the primary use,
<br />rather than as an accessory use for a single-
<br />family residence. Furthermore, complementing
<br />these two agricultural primary uses are a wide
<br />variety of permitted accessory uses includ-
<br />ing aquaculture, aquaponics, produce stand,
<br />greenhouse, hoop house, hydroponics, apiary/'
<br />beekeeping, chickenkeeping, and small-scale
<br />solar and wind energy production.
<br />Single-family homes are to remain the
<br />desired primary land use within Green Neigh-
<br />borhoods, but other uses must be allowed to
<br />spread through these neighborhoods, filling
<br />the gaps left behind by now vacant single-
<br />family lots. And while the intent is to put vacant
<br />parcels back into productive use, there is also
<br />potential for these new uses to negatively
<br />impact adjacent properties. As such, the zon-
<br />ing ordinance relies on a series of use -specific
<br />standards to mitigate potential negative im-
<br />pacts and ensure that green uses make for
<br />good neighbors.
<br />For example, while beekeeping is often
<br />viewed as problematic in more dense resi-
<br />dential settings, the zoning ordinance limits
<br />beekeepers to two hives with a maximum size
<br />of 20 cubic feet each, located to the rear third
<br />of the lot with a io-foot buffer from all lot lines
<br />and 25-foot buffer from any adjacent dwell-
<br />ing. In addition, a flyaway barrier such as a
<br />wall, fence, or dense vegetation is required to
<br />encourage bees to fly into the hive from above
<br />rather than from surrounding areas.
<br />NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
<br />AND CITY CORRIDORS
<br />In the 196os, Flint was a community of nearly
<br />200,000, with miles of growing highway cor-
<br />ridors bustling with new inline retail centers
<br />and shopping malls. Since that time, the city's
<br />population has shrunk by half, and the com-
<br />mercial landscape has shifted considerably
<br />ACCA 0 Aii4OciOivil# /dil,i The highlighted box indicates a larger lot created from assembly of smaller parcels.
<br />with new lifestyle centers, outlet malls, and a
<br />regional mall all located in outlying areas, be-
<br />yond city limits.
<br />in the fall of 2013, as the master plan was
<br />being drafted, city staff and dozens ofvolun-
<br />teers conducted a citywide commercial proper-
<br />ty inventory. The inventory revealed that more
<br />than one-third of the city's 3,211 commercial
<br />properties were vacant lots. Of the commercial
<br />parcels containing a structure, 1,452 (69 per-
<br />cent) were currently in use while the remaining
<br />584 (28 percent) were unoccupied.
<br />While Flint's struggles with population and
<br />job loss are well documented, it is not alone
<br />in its battle to reinvigorate aging commercial
<br />corridors. Like many cities across the country,
<br />Flint grew with the baby boom as retail strips
<br />with modern shopping centers supplanted the
<br />downtown with the promise of convenience and
<br />ample parking. Some 5o years later, the down-
<br />town is experiencing a renaissance, with nearly
<br />$40o million in investment since 2004, while
<br />the city's aging commercial corridors continue
<br />to decline, comprising much of Flint's more than
<br />1,10o vacant commercial parcels.
<br />With fewer than half of all commercial
<br />parcels actually in use, it is clear that drastic
<br />change is needed to stabilize Flint's commer-
<br />cial districts.
<br />The master plan includes two place types
<br />with a commercial land -use focus: Neighbor-
<br />hood Center and City Corridor. Neighborhood
<br />Centers provide opportunities to create mixed
<br />use, local -serving commercial districts that
<br />contribute to neighborhood character. City
<br />Corridors are auto -oriented but pedestrian -
<br />friendly commercial areas where tot consolida-
<br />tion and access management are used to ad-
<br />dress issues of shallow lot depth and proximity
<br />to residential areas. Both place types are used
<br />sparingly on the land -use map, with the intent
<br />of concentrating commercial activity in targeted
<br />areas to establish and maintain unique dis-
<br />tricts and vibrant nodes.
<br />In addition to land -use strategies, the
<br />city and its partners should focus small busi-
<br />ness assistance in areas designated for future
<br />commercial land use and limit use of programs
<br />in noncommercial areas as directed by the
<br />land -use plan. Similarly, the use of incentives
<br />should also be considered to attract and sustain
<br />development in priority areas. The master plan
<br />also encourages the city to repurpose publicly
<br />owned property to help establish momentum in
<br />target areas and transition publicly owned sites
<br />in other areas to noncommercial uses.
<br />ZONINGPRACTICE 5.16
<br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 4
<br />
|