My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/04/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/04/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:46 AM
Creation date
8/26/2016 4:34:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/04/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning for Small Business <br />By Arista Strungys, A!CP <br />Zoning often treats commercial districts as a singular land -use category, with little or <br />no distinction in scale or intensity. <br />A restaurant on the ground floor of a former warehouse. <br />In these instances, commercial districts gen- <br />erally seem the same on paper, with small <br />differences in setbacks and use permissions. <br />One of the problems with this approach is that <br />it can create unintentional barriers for small <br />businesses, businesses that have positive <br />impacts on a community that go beyond direct <br />economic benefits. <br />For example, successful small businesses <br />enhance community character and create an <br />identity that is unique to the municipality. <br />Some municipalities become known for their <br />local business environment. One community <br />may attract visitors to its local craft brewery <br />and restaurant scene. Another may have a <br />successful downtown with small shops that <br />sell the wares of local artists, which attract <br />residents as well as visitors from neighboring <br />communities. These communities become <br />known for being hubs of these types of small <br />businesses. <br />Small businesses also facilitate the adap- <br />tive reuse of existing structures. Small busi- <br />nesses are more flexible in location and space <br />needs than larger scale businesses and chain <br />stores, which is something that can work to the <br />community's advantage. Smaller businesses <br />can locate in established smaller storefronts, <br />and they can also take advantage of new devel- <br />opment spaces. For example, if a community <br />has large industrial buildings no longer able <br />to support manufacturing, these can be reno- <br />vated into smaller spaces and leased to small <br />local businesses. <br />By acknowledging the place and role of <br />small businesses in the community within <br />development regulations, these potential <br />benefits can come to fruition. Small busi- <br />nesses have specific regulatory needs, so it is <br />important that zoning ordinances do not create <br />unintentional barriers instead of opening up <br />opportunities for entrepreneurship. This article <br />discusses two key areas of zoning regulation <br />that affect small businesses: 1) use classifica- <br />tion and permissions and 2) development <br />standards. <br />CAN YOUR ZONING ORDINANCE BE `USED' FOR <br />SMALL BUSINESSES? <br />An out-of-date approach to classifying and <br />permitting uses is one of the biggest barriers <br />to small businesses and, quite frankly, can <br />negatively impact commercial development <br />throughout a community regardless of scale. <br />Use classification and permission schemes <br />that are too specific, too narrowly drawn, and <br />contain obsolete uses pose significant barriers. <br />Meanwhile, a modern approach to use clas- <br />sification and permission builds in flexibilities <br />that can address emerging uses over time with- <br />out discretionary approvals. <br />Principal Uses <br />Older ordinances often build inflexibility into <br />commercial use permissions in two ways: 1) by <br />taking a specific use approach and 2) by orga- <br />nizing permissions in a cumulative or pyramid <br />system of uses. Combined, these approaches <br />can frustrate potential new small businesses <br />by requiring lengthy and expensive special ap- <br />provals, complicating interpretations of permis- <br />sions, and discouraging emerging uses. <br />The specific use approach has become <br />disfavored in modern practice because of its <br />length and inability to respond to new and <br />emerging uses. Inherent in a specific use - <br />based approach is the requirement that every <br />possible use desired by the municipality must <br />be included in the use list or, by virtue of exclu- <br />sion, it is prohibited. <br />One approach that better addresses the <br />control and administration of uses within an <br />ordinance is to adopt a categorical use ap- <br />proach, where specific uses are grouped into <br />larger "generic" categories. Modern practice <br />has moved toward this approach because of <br />two main benefits. First, it eliminates the need <br />for exhaustive lists; hence, the sections of the <br />ordinance detailing use permissions become <br />shorter and easier to understand. Second, the <br />categorical use approach provides the munici- <br />pality with flexibility to review and permit those <br />uses that may be desirable for the community <br />within the broad context of the use definitions, <br />without worrying about whether or not the use <br />is specifically listed. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 7.16 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.