Laserfiche WebLink
supportive of this alternative. <br /> Alternative 42: Approve a modified version of Resolutions 416-08-151 and 416-08-152, and recommend City <br /> Council approval of a modified version of Resolutions 416-08-153 and 416-08-154. This action would be based on <br /> discussion. Staff believes that the needs of the Applicant can be balanced with the concerns of the City to achieve a <br /> reasonable overage amount,which is reflected in the reduction of the requested overage. However, if there are <br /> specific revisions that the Planning Commission identifies as being appropriate, Staff would not be opposed to this <br /> option. <br /> Alternative 43: Do not approve the variance request and do not recommend City Council approval of the <br /> Conditional Use Permit. The amended request is more compatible with the existing residential development pattern <br /> and character of the area than the original request. Staff believes that the needs of the Applicant can be achieved <br /> with the reduced square footage and helps alleviate concerns of Staff about the size of the overage request. <br /> Therefore, staff does not support this option. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Staff had a number of concerns with the original CUP request and worked with the Applicant to address them and <br /> arrive at a compromise that would meet the needs of the applicant while balancing the concerns of the city.The <br /> primary concern being that the scale was incompatible with the existing development pattern and residential <br /> character of the area.There is also the perennial concern about the potential to introduce commercial activity into <br /> a residential area. While staff supports allowing a reasonable overage in building size,the original request did not <br /> demonstrate a clear justification of need. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the Applicant's reduced building size of 2,400 square feet, and not the full 4,000 <br /> square feet as proposed.This equates to an overage of 824 square feet when including the existing accessory <br /> structure. Staff recommends approval of the variance request to allow for a peak height of twenty-two (22)feet <br /> and a mean gable height of eighteen (18)feet to accommodate storage of the motor home. Additionally, staff <br /> recommends that the building be serviced by a second driveway, with access off of Vicuna Street. <br /> Action: <br /> Motion to approve Resolutions#16-08-151 and#16-08-152 granting a variance to the height requirements for <br /> accessory buildings, and motion to recommend City Council adopt Resolutions#16-08-153 and #16-08-154 <br /> allowing the accessory building to exceed the maximum allowed square footage. <br /> Attachments <br /> Site Location Map <br /> Applicant Submital Packet <br /> CUP Findings <br /> CUP <br /> Variance Findings <br /> Variance <br /> Form Review <br /> Inbox Reviewed By Date <br /> Tim Gladhill(Originator) Tim Gladhill 08/26/2016 04:07 PM <br /> Form Started By:Tim Gladhill Started On:08/26/2016 04:00 PM <br /> Final Approval Date:08/26/2016 <br />