My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/01/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/01/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:52 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 11:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/01/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
414
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RENTAL HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS <br /> Competitive Market Area Rental Communities <br /> To gauge how market rate communities may be meeting the needs of moderate-income house- <br /> holds, Maxfield Research surveyed a sampling of the market rate communities (eight newer <br /> communities and eight older communities) in the Market Area. Information on location, number <br /> of units, vacancies, unit mix and sizes, and monthly rents are displayed in Table 20 and 21. A <br /> comparison of amenities and services is presented in Table 22. <br /> The following are key points from Table 20 and 21: <br /> • There are 1,255 units in the surveyed newer facilities in Table 20. Of these, 45 were found <br /> vacant. This translates to an overall vacancy rate of 3.86%, which is below the 5.0% level <br /> considered to be market equilibrium. Market equilibrium is considered by the industry to re- <br /> flect sufficient consumer choice and adequate turnover. An overall vacancy rate of 3.86% <br /> generally indicates that current demand exceeds current supply, although this number only <br /> represents newer rental facilities and not the market as a whole. <br /> • Monthly rents among the newer surveyed units averaged$725 for one-bedroom units <br /> ($0.97/sq. ft.), $865 for two-bedroom units ($0.86/sq. ft.), and$1,110 for three-bedroom <br /> units ($0.90/sq. ft.). It should be noted that all of the communities but three charged an addi- <br /> tional fee for enclosed parking (Cutters Grove, Dellwood Estates, and Champlin Drive in- <br /> clude enclosed parking in the monthly rent). Extra fees for parking ranged from$40 to $65 <br /> per month. <br /> • The surveyed older rental facilities consist of 1,096 units. There were 60 vacant units found <br /> in these facilities. This translates to a vacancy rate of 5.5%, which is just slightly above the <br /> 5.0% level considered to be market equilibrium. This vacancy rate indicates that current <br /> supply may be meeting current demand; however, desirability of the units could also be a <br /> factor in the higher vacancy rate. <br /> • Monthly rents among the older surveyed units averaged$670 for one-bedroom units <br /> ($0.86/sq. ft.), $776 for two-bedroom units ($0.78/sq. ft.), and$913 for three-bedroom units <br /> ($0.71/sq. ft.). All of the communities except for Woodland North charged an additional fee <br /> for enclosed parking. Extra fees for parking ranged from$40 to $50 per month. <br /> • Using the industry standard that households can afford a housing cost of 30% of their in- <br /> come, a single earning approximately $30,000 could afford the average one-bedroom rent in <br /> the newer apartments. Singles earning approximately $28,000 could afford one-bedroom <br /> units at older apartments. Two-person households would need incomes of approximately <br /> $36,000 and $32,000 to afford units at the newer and older communities,respectively. Over- <br /> all, our analysis of the market rate communities finds that these units, despite being market <br /> rate, provide housing to workforce households. <br /> MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.