My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/01/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/01/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:52 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 11:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/01/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
414
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> more drawn to an age-restricted building, which is among the products recommended in this re- <br /> port. <br /> General Occupancy Rental <br /> There is an identified need for more market rate and affordable general occupancy rental units in <br /> Ramsey to serve workforce households. Our recommended rental concept is shown in Table 29, <br /> including unit mix, sizes and rents. <br /> The affordable units in Table 29 (restricted to households earning 50% to 60% of median income <br /> —or about$31,000 to $37,000 for two-person households)would satisfy need from many <br /> younger households in entry-level jobs in Ramsey and the surrounding area. Market rate units <br /> would also satisfy a portion of the demand from workforce households with incomes slightly too <br /> high to qualify for subsidized/affordable units. It should also be noted, however, that because of <br /> high land, material, and labor costs, the rents for a market rate building to be financially feasible <br /> may be too high for the community to even draw much of its target market—moderate-to aver- <br /> age-income younger households. Thus, to reduce development costs for the market rate units, <br /> we recommend a mixed-income rental building that includes both affordable and market rate <br /> units. <br /> TABLE 29 <br /> RECOMMENDED RENTAL HOUSING COMMUNITY <br /> CITY OF RAMSEY <br /> January 2006 <br /> AFFORDABLE UNITS(AT 50% TO 60% OF MEDIAN INCOME) <br /> Pct.of Square Affordable Rent/ <br /> Unit Type Units Feet Rate Sq.Ft. <br /> IBR 30% - 35% 775 - 800 $675 - $700 $0.87 - $0.88 <br /> 2BR 50% - 60% 1,025 - 1,075 $825 - $925 $0.80 - $0.86 <br /> 3BR 10% - 15% 1,250 - 1,325 $1,000 - $1,050 $0.80 - $0.79 <br /> Total 80 - 100 <br /> MARKET RATE UNITS <br /> IBR 35% - 40% 800 - 825 $875 - $950 $1.09 - $1.15 <br /> 2BR 45% - 55% 1,075 - 1,175 $1,150 - $1,300 $1.07 - $1.11 <br /> 3BR 10% - 15% 1,300 - 1,400 $1,400 - $1,500 $1.08 - $1.07 <br /> Total 125 - 140 <br /> Note: recommended rents are in 2006 dollars and can be trended upward by 2.5% <br /> annually until opening. <br /> Source:Maxfield Research,Inc. <br /> As shown in Table 29, we recommend a mixed-income apartment building with 205 to 240 units. <br /> Sixty percent of the units (125 to 140 units) should be market rate, totaling 125 to 140 units. The <br /> remaining 40% of units should be affordable to households at a mix of those at 50% and 60% of <br /> MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.