Laserfiche WebLink
Member Williams asked if a zoning change would be required to develop this parcel as <br /> residential. <br /> Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama stated right now the Pearson property <br /> is zoned medium density residential with a portion zoned high density and a slice of it retail. <br /> Member Riley asked if there was any infrastructure there to support residential. <br /> Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama stated there was not and City services <br /> are required in order to develop the property. <br /> Chairperson Steffen asked if it would matter if the business park was on the Pearson or Hagman <br /> side. <br /> Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama stated when looking at setbacks from <br /> the railroad track, if they move to the north side they would eliminate the consideration of that <br /> issue. All of the property was farmland at one point. He stated he did not see a substantial <br /> difference and they would need to investigate as the property that Hagman envisioned for a <br /> school is platted today, which means development fees have been paid, and may be an advantage <br /> for the business park. He stated legally they platted this with utilities running up to it, and may <br /> be in a better position as far as development costs. <br /> Member Williams thought there were several concerns regarding this. She thought the three <br /> hundred feet from the railroad tracks is for a very small segment of potential users. There are a <br /> lot of different types of industrial uses within the United States within three hundred feet from <br /> the railroad tracks. She thought there was a lack of visibility on the north side of Bunker Lake <br /> Boulevard extension. Having the visibility from Highway 10 is appealing to some of the <br /> industrial users, not all, but that is something they should consider when looking at a number of <br /> users for this. <br /> Chairperson Steffen asked if option four had some appeal with being close to the railroad track <br /> because of the visibility. <br /> Member Williams indicated it would. <br /> Member Skaff asked what the political ramifications are of the City buying and holding land <br /> based on past experience. <br /> Member Williams felt that was something the Council should consider based on a <br /> recommendation of the EDA. If the EDA is interested in pursuing that avenue and there are <br /> strong reasons that can be articulated as to why, she would absolutely champion that in front of <br /> the Council. <br /> Member Riley stated he made it a point of getting the City out of the land ownership and <br /> development business and he would have a very hard time justifying the fact that they don't <br /> Economic Development Authority/May 5, 2016 <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br />