My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 09/01/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2016
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 09/01/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:31:40 PM
Creation date
8/30/2016 11:48:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
09/01/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.02: Set Preliminary Goals for Corridor Improvement Program (Strategic Action Plan <br /> Tactics No. 28 & 29) <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report. <br /> Councilmember LeTourneau referenced number three, the financial incentives, and stated that he <br /> would think that would be the responsibility of the business owner. He stated that perhaps he <br /> could support that item if that item could be tied into the EDA revolving loan fund. <br /> Councilmember Riley agreed that it appeared to him that the City was asking a business to be <br /> better than they have to be and therefore he agreed that perhaps a method to utilize that item would <br /> be a low interest loan. <br /> Councilmember Kuzma agreed and stated that perhaps number one would also tie into the EDA. <br /> Councilmember Riley stated that he would not support number one as the City already owns too <br /> much land and is trying to get out of landownership. <br /> The City Administrator stated that there are some variations of that, such as when the City used <br /> the County HRA funds to purchase the bookstore property. He stated that the intent would not be <br /> to invest in more property but to reinvest funds from the sale of properties in order to resolve some <br /> of the blighted sites. <br /> Councilmember Riley stated that he would like to see something happen, specifically in regard to <br /> the "low hanging fruit"rather than just have discussions. <br /> Mayor Strommen asked the thought process of having the Council weigh in on these strategies <br /> prior to the public engagement meetings. She stated that she would not want to narrow this before <br /> the public input is gained. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that these five items have financial implications <br /> and therefore staff wanted to gain the input of the Council before putting these ideas out to the <br /> stakeholders in the corridor. He stated that there is some"low hanging fruit"but noted that some <br /> of those items are within the current policy and some are not. <br /> Mayor Strommen stated that she did not see this issue as code enforcement and believed that the <br /> City would struggle to achieve these goals if this is done as code enforcement. She stated that she <br /> would see this as public engagement. <br /> Councilmember Johns agreed with the comments of Mayor Strommen. She addressed the <br /> Highway 47 corridor and stated that Anoka is getting ready to do a gateway project on Highway <br /> 47 and then you would go into Ramsey that does not have improvement in the corridor. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that staff will then reach out to the stakeholders <br /> for Highway 10 and Highway 47 and confirmed the consensus of the Council for staff to meet with <br /> those stakeholders to gain input. <br /> Excerpt from April 12, 2016 City Council Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.