Laserfiche WebLink
contract, such as introducing organics. This would also be most efficient from an administrative perspective as Staff <br /> would only be working with a single hauler regarding education,promotion,and reporting. Staff supports this <br /> alternative. <br /> Alternative 2. Recommend that the City migrate to an open hauling system. This would give each property owner <br /> the flexibility to choose their recycling service provider but more than likely would result in greater traffic volumes <br /> on collection day,more wear and tear and roads,and more Staff time when it comes to preparing required reports <br /> due to Anoka County. Staff would be concerned that this would ultimately result in a decrease in participation as <br /> well as an overall decrease in the materials recycled. Staff does not support this alternative unless an additional <br /> recycling opportunity such as a recycling center is considered. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> This is being handled as part of Staffs regular duties and since it focuses on recycling,will be reimbursable with <br /> SCORE funds. <br /> Action: <br /> Motion to recommend that the City continue to provide recycling as a contracted service by either(1)initiating <br /> negotiations with the current hauler or(2)preparing an RFP for consideration. <br /> -or- <br /> Motion to recommend that the City move to an open hauling system for recycling. <br /> Attachments <br /> Current Recycling Contract <br /> Program Goals <br /> Cost Comparison of Contracted Communities <br /> June 20,2016 Case Report <br /> Form Review <br /> Inbox Reviewed By Date <br /> Tim Gladhill Tim Gladhill 07/14/2016 03:29 PM <br /> Form Started By:Chris Anderson Started On:07/14/2016 08:41 AM <br /> Final Approval Date:07/14/2016 <br />