My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/14/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/14/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:50:11 PM
Creation date
8/30/2016 12:13:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
07/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br /> TO: Mark Riverblood <br /> FROM: Nathan Greenwald <br /> DATE: July 11th, 2016 <br /> SUBJECT: Tennis Court Options <br /> Present Options <br /> 1. Do Nothing <br /> a. Courts are currently used by a group of 15-20 people, two times a week. Spalling damage is <br /> increasing from use. <br /> 2. Strip surface on single court, repaint boundaries. <br /> a. Could be cheapest, most efficient option. <br /> b. Have not heard back from contacts about this course of action. <br /> c. Having trouble getting information about this practice. <br /> d. As long as the top layer of asphalt was intact, without any damage that could make play unsafe <br /> this could be utilized. <br /> e. Without an acrylic top layer, any uneven or non-uniform area could be worn down further, hold <br /> water, or be a playing hazard for those on the court. <br /> f. Runs the risk of not being level, not eliminating cracks, etc. But could still be playable. <br /> i. Current surface underneath is cracked just like top layer, would need at least another <br /> layer of fresh asphalt, and crack filler. To provide a safe amount of traction and foot <br /> security. <br /> ii. It is also grainy, sandy, showing signs of age. This needs to be addressed. <br /> iii. Could still be cheaper than doing it the "conventional tennis way"however it will lose <br /> all aesthetic appeal. <br /> 3. Repair the one court (with severe spalling) entirely. <br /> a. Numerous quotes on this job. <br /> b. Would cost anywhere from $6,500-$8,000. <br /> c. Would make this one court playable, would take a week or more. <br /> d. Appearance would be different from the remaining courts. (just newer, could get same color <br /> match) <br /> e. Would make the playing area safe. <br /> 4. Repair the entire four court system. <br /> a. Three quotes on this job. <br /> b. Would cost anywhere from $19,000 - $30,000 <br /> i. That is $4,750 to $7,500 a court. <br /> ii. Would require same amount of time as single court replacement. <br /> c. Would fill in all cracks, provide a nice, even, uniform surface for play. <br /> d. More expensive, yet very viable option. <br /> e. Would need to happen again in 4-7 years (according to tennis court surface experts). <br /> £ Would make the entire playing area/court system safe, and is the safest solution other than <br /> complete court reconstruction. <br /> 5. Court Reconstruction. <br /> a. This option was researched, but not quoted as it takes all of the courts out of play. <br /> b. Should strongly be considered for the future if courts crack before the normal 4-7 year <br /> maintenance schedule. <br /> c. Can cost anywhere from$100,0004200,000 depending on size of court, base layers, and <br /> playing surfaces selected. We have a multi-court system so the price will be higher. This would <br /> allow for a new, safe court, with potentially easier, more cost effective maintenance for the <br /> future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.