Laserfiche WebLink
On June 16th, four options for alleviating localized flooding issues in the Gibbon Street area were <br /> discussed with the Public Works Committee. Figure 2 in Appendix A shows the alignments of <br /> the four options presented including; <br /> Option#1: This option requires installing a pipe in an existing drainage and utility easement. <br /> The initial plan was to install approximately 800 feet of pipe by jacking to avoid large trees <br /> within the easement and cutting a deep trench through Iguana Street. This was determined to be <br /> infeasible after further investigation for the following reasons. The jacking pit would need to be <br /> placed in one wetland and the receiving pit and pipe fusing area would need to be in the second <br /> area. Both areas are over 400 feet from the nearest road. Access would require acquisition of <br /> additional easements. The fused pipe may tend to sink into the wetland prior to being pulled <br /> back. The City did a project in 2012 where the boring machine was placed on upland in an <br /> existing easement extending to the street. The welding of the pipe was done on planking <br /> extended from an existing road. The jacked length was approximately 800 feet. The total project <br /> cost was $160,000. The Gibbon street project would require additional easements and restoration <br /> of all disturbed lawn surfaces. <br /> Option#2: This option requires cleaning the existing County Ditch that runs north of this <br /> development. This option is not feasible because it would require lowering the existing surface <br /> area of some wetlands up to 2 feet which is not permitted under the Wetland Conservation Act. <br /> Option#3: This option considered the suggestion of the property owners at 17421 Gibbon Street <br /> NW for using a different set of drainage and utility easements to provide drainage to the west. <br /> This route is not feasible due to the presence of two high areas that would need to have pipe <br /> installed under them and because there is minimal elevation difference between the beginning <br /> and ending points which could ultimately result in backflow, making the situation worse. <br /> Option#4: This option considered extending storm sewer pipe south in the Gibbon Street right- <br /> of-way, then west along the 173rd Avenue right-of-way to provide positive drainage from the <br /> land-locked area to a County Ditch. This option appears to be feasible, though the location and <br /> elevation of existing small utilities along the route would need to be verified during final design, <br /> as would the normal water level of the existing wetland east of Gibbon Street. This option was <br /> estimated to cost $325,000, which does not include the acquisition of easements which are not <br /> anticipated but would need to be verified during final design. <br /> Upon reviewing Staff's findings for the four options, the Public Works Committee recommended <br /> the City Council order a feasibility report to further refine option#4, including an analysis and <br /> determination of estimated costs, available funding sources, and whether any City policies would <br /> need to be created or amended to construct the improvements. On October 27th, 2015, the City <br /> Council directed staff to prepare a Feasibility Report to further explore option 94. <br /> The owners of 17421 Gibbon Street NW were among the residents that contacted the City in the <br /> spring of 2014 with high water concerns stating groundwater was coming up through their <br /> basement floor due to adjacent wetlands. Staff visited the site in 2014 and observed the adjacent <br /> wetlands were full and the surface water level was near the road two lots to the north. Staff is not <br /> aware of any water flowing over Gibbon Street in 2014. Staff is not aware of any surface water <br /> levels ever reaching the lowest openings of any homes in the area. <br /> Feasibility Report <br /> Gibbon Street and 173rd Avenue Drainage Improvements <br /> City of Ramsey Project No.16-88 Page 3 <br />