My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 05/17/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2016
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 05/17/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:48:42 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 12:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
05/17/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
estimated costs to the Committee for further discussion. Attached is an updated cost estimate which totals <br /> $46,782.75. This includes all estimated costs required to construct the settling basin shown in attached Figure 4,to <br /> construct required storm sewer modifications,to fill in the drainage Swale across the rear of the Bergevin property, <br /> to remove the storm sewer structure at the end of the Swale on the west side of the Bergevin property,to restore all <br /> disturbed areas using sod(Bergevin property only) and a wetland seed mix(all other areas), and to vacate the <br /> easement the Swale was located in. The estimated costs also include 10%contingency costs for unknowns and <br /> miscellaneous pay items not included in the cost estimate, as well as 23%indirect costs for administrative, <br /> engineering, finance, and legal fees. Staff previously estimated construction costs for the proposed settling basin <br /> and restoration of the Swale would cost between$15,000 and$45,000. <br /> A link to this case was sent to the property owner,who indicated they will be present at the meeting Tuesday <br /> evening. <br /> Timeframe: <br /> Approximately 20 minutes for presentation and discussion. <br /> Observations/Alternatives: <br /> Staff believes that the water observed in the bottom of the Swale in recent years is most likely not from storm water <br /> runoff but is rather groundwater rising in conjunction with the lake level rising. <br /> Permits from both the DNR and the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization would be required to <br /> complete the requested improvements as the settling basin and overflow would be located within wetland 114P (see <br /> attached Figure 3)which requires a WMO permit,and the work would be occurring below the Ordinary High <br /> Water Level which requires a permit from the DNR. In addition,wetland mitigation credits would need to be <br /> purchased at a 2:1 ratio to replace the impacted wetland due to construction of the settling basin. This is reflected in <br /> the attached estimated costs. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> Funding for the City's share of any ordered improvements would be paid from the Stormwater Fund. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Staff recommends that the property owner be required to pay for the requested work since it solely benefits the use <br /> of his property. However,the City could consider contributing an amount commensurate with the estimated <br /> long-term savings associated with maintaining a settling basin next to a public street versus maintaining a linear <br /> drainage Swale along the rear of a private property. Based on a 50 year maintenance schedule,this cost would be <br /> approximately$500 assuming the City would dredge and restore the turf in the Swale twice,once every 25 years. <br /> If the settling basin is constructed Staff also recommends filling in and sodding the Swale across the rear yard of the <br /> subject property,removing the storm sewer structure on the west end of the Swale, and vacating the existing <br /> drainage easement that encumbered the Swale and drainage structure to prevent the need to maintain this <br /> infrastructure since a public purpose is no longer being served. However,the easement over the sanitary sewer line <br /> on the east side of the property would still be retained. <br /> Action: <br /> Staff is requesting Committee direction on whether this request should be forwarded to Council for consideration <br /> of approval and, if so,whether the Committee has a recommendation on whether the City should contribute <br /> anything towards the project. If the Committee is in agreement with the property owner's request, Staff requests that <br /> the Committee provide a formal recommendation for the City Council since this item would require Council <br /> approval since it is not a budgeted project. <br /> Attachments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.