Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Cox and <br />Pearson. Voting No: Councilmembers DeLuca and Sorteberg. <br /> <br />Mr. G~;~drich stated that he will set a new hearing date of October 3(), 1987 <br />at 10:00 a.m. and he will notify the property owners by letter. <br /> <br />Case ~10: ~ <br /> <br />Council consensus is to schedule a special City Council meeting for <br />Tuesday, October 20 t~. ~:iscus$ the 1988 budget and that the first portion <br />of the budget to be discussed is the community education program and the <br />request for the addition of a key communicator program. <br /> <br />update On Reauests For Tax Increment Assistance: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley reviewed with Council the figures he has compiled regarding <br />current and requested tax increment participation, principle and interest <br />required to bond, debt service and projected revenue generated and time <br />table for receipt of those revenues for the Willey/Chateau and Summit <br />American/Montgomery Constructions, Inc. proposals. Mr. Hartley stated that <br />it seems clear that both proposals (Willey/Chateau and Summit American) <br />will have to proceed in order for the project to be feasible. The project <br />would be very successful if SAC payments were accelerated in order to <br />eliminate the four year deficit period. The next step, which has been <br />indicated to Mr. Carson, is to enter into a preliminary development <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson stated that Chateau and Summit American are willing to proceed <br />but can't until there is an affirmative commitment from Council regarding <br />the use of tax increment revenues. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that the preliminary agreement would indicate council's <br />intention to proceed with the project, the intention of the developers to <br />proceed, set out escrow requirements, the intention of both parties to <br />enter into a subsequent development agreement. ~ne final agreement would <br />address accelerated SAC pa~nnents. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca stated that accelerated SAC payments are crucial to <br />the feasibility cf the project and should be addressed in the preliminary <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Motion by Counci!m~ber Cox and seconded by Counci!member Sorteberg to <br />table further discussion of this case until the special City Council <br />meeting scheduled for October 2C, 1987. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: ~ycr ~imann, Counci!members Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting <br /> <br />AD JOU!LN~NT <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Counciimember Sorteberg to <br />adjourn the ~pecia! City Counc~il meeting. <br /> City Council/October 13, i987 <br /> <br />Page 17 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />