My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/01/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/01/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:33:44 AM
Creation date
6/25/2004 2:05:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/01/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TAKING EXCEPTION <br /> <br /> Cul-dc,sac dispute not as it seems <br />Vour editorial ~ ~which extends for <br /> l. regarding . . approximately -six- <br />Wellington:'Way in tenths of a mile <br />Eagan may. have before exiting at <br />offered some Com- Johnny Cake Ridge <br /> Road, And ~ consid- <br />mon-sense advice to ,::., ~:,: <br />potential buyers .of. : -..:...~ ~'~,~'.;?:-_:'i:::'. erable, number of :.. ~i <br />properties .. (caveat v:': ~:: '~ .... - .people reside : on <br />emptor), but I believe - - LAlql Sherwood Way, to <br />I hear the whine of a JACOBSEN say nothing of the <br />developer's voice in people on adjoining ,' <br /> <br />the opinion writer's ear ("Cul. 'cul-de-sacs -- ail of whom will <br />de-sac culture clash," June 7). suffer additional traffic and <br />The issue is not just about a eul-. ' noise. Bear in mind that these <br />de-sac. ~._ · · :streets do not have sidewalks, <br />It woUld seem that the edito- and the residents of Brittany <br />rial writer was not in atten- Estates have, for the .'last 18 <br />dance-at the May 25 EaganPlan- years, been doing their walking, <br />ntng Advisory Commisgion -biking, stroller-pushing and <br />meeting, which was well attend- dog-walking on the very streets <br />ed by the public, rFnere is at that you note will open [o."one <br />least a serious question as to of the city's busiest arteries.". <br />whether the Cul-de-Sac Extort- Check with the Eagan fire <br />sion Agreement between the chief, as one 'resident did, and <br />city. of Eagan and Toliefson he will likely tell you that the <br />Brothers (developers of the Brit- -extension of Wellington. Way <br />tany Estates 9th. Addition) was doesn't provide for better <br />eyer filed with Dakota County, <br />Which was required-to serve <br /> <br />notice to original and future <br />buyers of homes on Wellington <br />Way.. And at least one-original <br />homeowner on 'Wellington <br />avowed publicly that plans to <br />someday extend Wellington had <br />never been disclosed to him by <br />the developer. <br /> Legal technicalities aside, <br />· the proposed extension of <br />-Wellington .Way does riot just <br />affect the "16 or so homes on <br />Wellington Way." Wellington <br /> <br />Way leads to ~herwood'Way, <br /> <br />response of fire vehicles in the <br />area. The proposed new devel- <br />opment on the former Diamond <br />T Ranch would be. served by the <br />fire' stations current!~ .on Pilot <br />Knob. <br />So, even if we accept at face "always',' planned "someday" to <br />value the assertion that the city- · extend Wellington Way as a <br />of Eagan has "always" had plans .. through-street. Well, sometimes <br />'to extend Wellington to Pilot even the best plans donj.t bear <br />Knob, is this all there is to the up with the passage of time. <br />"clash"? The discussions at the Current residents of Wellington <br />Advisory Planning Commission "' Way and other Brittany streets <br />meeting touched on a number of are right to be concerned about <br />concerns about, the ,.proposed' <br /> "Imxur~'.~levelopment .By. and <br /> <br />large, current residents of the <br />area are not opposed to develop-. <br />men~ of the Diamond .T, but do <br />have c°ncerns about the hum: <br />bet of homes the developer pro- <br />poses, destruction of 81 percent <br />of the existing trees on the site, <br />concerns for water quality (and <br />possibly volume) due to runoff <br />from a surface that was estimat- <br />ed to be 35 percent impervious; <br />and . possible contamination' <br />from a place that once (and still <br />does) ' have' .: a '~ considerable <br /> <br />happen to the market value of <br />the homes they ,have carefully <br />maintained for 18 years -- when <br />they are no longer on a cul-de- <br />sac; when they:, are now 'on a <br />bUSy through-street. · :ShOuld <br />these homeowners suffer a loss <br />jn value' and in the quality of <br />their lives for'the benefit of resi- <br />:dents Of'the new. mansions next <br />door? If I can afford a more lux- <br />.urious l~ome than yours, does it <br />confer upon me the right to.take <br />a path through your back yard? <br /> When' it comes down to it, <br />much of the "culture clash" you <br />refer to isn't about culture at all. <br />More, likely, it comes down to <br />wfiat citizens in attendance at <br />the Planning comralsSi0n meet- <br />ing were too-polite to bring up <br />-- money. Money_that a develop- <br />er expects to make from Selling <br />as many luxau'y homes as possi- <br />ble' 'on a 37-acre site, money the <br />city and counw: can expect' from <br />. new property 'taxes, moneY the <br />local 'businesses are eager to <br />take. frOm new residents. ': '-'- <br /> <br />'I 'applaud. the Eagan Plan- <br />amount of horse manure. The . ning .Commission for caring <br />list. goes 0r~: 'i , : ... '-: - :)-enough about current residents <br /> The city of Eagan may haVe to listen ~rioUsly to..the Con- <br /> 'cOrns the 'proposed- develOp- <br /> .ment raised, and for giving the <br /> public a fair opportunity to be <br /> heard.' .I. invite 'the opinion <br /> 'writer of last week's editorial to <br /> come Out to future meetings and <br /> do some listening as well. you <br /> ' missed thepoint on this one. <br />losing the 'freedom of their <br />streets. ~ also of what may -JacObsen l~vesin.~ag.a}.n. <br /> ~ ......... : .... : ................ .................. :- ....................... <br /> <br />76" <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.