Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE #6: crrY'S LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE: <br /> <br />Enclosure (DZ-f) contains a letter from T. C. Field & Company, the City's insurance <br />agent, dated November 3, 1983. In September or October 1983 I requested that <br />the City's liability coverage be checked out. Accordingly, this has been done <br />by our agent and he is recommending that the City's umbrella policy be increased <br />to three million dollars. I would also recommend that Council increase it to <br />that amount. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be to approve of the City increasing it's coverage <br />to either the one million dollar umbrella at $1,175 or the three million dollar <br />umbrella at $1,650. The following proposed motion is hereby submitted for your <br />consideration:, \ ~_ ~~. 37~01~O <br />Motion by ~J . and secondedby approve of the <br /> umbrella policy at a cost of $_~.~_~ as submitted by T. C. Field & Company, <br /> the City's insurance agent. Further, that T. C. Field & Company be furnished <br /> a certified excerpt copy of the Council meeting minutes pertaining to this <br /> motion. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br />Voting no <br /> <br />CASE ~ 7: MISCELLANEOUS (A. RUM RIVER BRIDGE CROSSING; B. REOUESTED <br /> <br />CHANGING OF ALL-WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY <br />ROADS #116 AND #57): <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />The following is hereby submitted on these two issues: <br /> <br /> a) Rum River bridge crossing - I spoke to County Commissioner Natalie Haas <br />and she states that they are still working on this and she feels quite confident <br />about getting a grant to construct this bridge. <br /> <br />Council Action: No action is required. <br /> <br />  ~ b) City's requested changing of all-way stop signs at the intersection of County <br /> ~x~t3'Roads #116 and #57 - Enclosure (DZ-~) contains a letter from Anoka County <br /> ~' ~)~c~ated November 10, 1983 responding to the changing of the signalization of the <br /> _~-~b~above stated intersection. The City had requested that the stop signs be removed <br /> ~ ..~ fromCountyRoad#57. <br /> ~ ~ Council Action: Your action will be whatever you desire on this case. <br />(~A'$~ ~=8:/~UP ~C~AD,]~G OF~xMAGN~M ST~-E~ NM: . <br /> <br /> to ~tisctmsJit with Council~-~-~ -- ~..o.,x~--~-~.+~~v~e~____. - <br /> <br />CASE #9: LANDFILL (A. LANDFILL INSPECTION REPORTS FOR OCTOBER 1983, B. <br /> <br />LANDFILL LAWSU1T ISSUEh <br /> <br /> a) Landfill inspection reports for the month of October 1983 - Please refer <br />to enclosure (DZ-h) for stated report. Council requested at the October 25, 1983 <br />meeting that the County submit a typewritten report. I conveyed your request <br />to the County and they re.~onded stating that tLe report is handwritten in the <br />field and that this is what we are going to get from them. l~lease refer to C-1 <br />for ~ 13 and ~ ] ~ which are ]-~tters pertaining to this issu,~'. ~/)_ , . t ~ ~, , <br /> <br /> <br />