Agenda - Council - 11/22/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

m m C~issioner Ztn~nerman asked if this construction was for a ne~ building. Commissioner Deemer stated that the variance was for a tenporary building. m Ch~ir~n Peterson stated that he had ~ problem with the findings. He asked if anyone else had a proble~n wtth them. I I I There was no response. Mr. Berg stated that a conditional use permit was not required for the business but for the structure and felt this was the best way to handle it. He will have to enter into an agreement for the building. Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Schneider to recommend adopting the proposed findings of fact for Mr. and Mrs. James Chapman's conditional use permit request. m Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Co~nissioners Zin~nern~n, Deemer, Schneider and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Kennen. m Chairman Peterson asked Mr. and Mrs. Chapman if they had reviewed the agreement and if they were in agreement with it. m m m m They indicated they were. Commissioner Deemer asked about the required setback for the building. Mr. Berg indicated they were in compliance with the setbacks. Commissioner Schneider asked of City utilities become available, would the buildings have to be re~ved within a certain period of time. Mr. Berg indicated there is a time limit~or_thett_removal. Motion by Commissioner Schneider and seconded by Cxxmnissioner Deemer to recommend that the City approve Mr. and Mrs. games Chapman's request for a conditional use permit to construct the necessary buildings and operate a garden market at 6745 West Highway ~10 contingent upon their entering into an agreement with the City. m m m m I ! Further Discussion: Mr. Chapman asked Mr. Berg what would make this a permanent building. Mr. Berg stated it would have to meet the State Building Code requirements. Mr. Chapman and Mr. Berg discussed briefly the code requirements - permanent vs. temporary. .. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairnmn Peterson, ConmnisSioners Zin~nemran, Deemer, LaDue and Schneider. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Kennen. Case #2: Request For Concept Approval For Pondvale Estates Second Addition: Mr. and Mrs. Mary Kytonen were present. Discussion ensued regarding access and drainage. Ccm~nisstoner Deemer referred to Item ~6 of the City Engineer's report and stated that it should be dele~:ed and that the City Engineer should note that all park fees were paid at th~) time of the original plat. P & Z/October 4, 1983 Paqe 3 of 5