Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />Park Fund - <br /> <br />215-41001 <br /> <br />$13,775.00 <br /> <br /> New Employee (1,680 hours <br /> (400 hours charge to Gen. Fund) <br />215-41021 PERA 585.00 <br />215-41022 FICA 975.00 <br />215-41031 Group Insurance 1,355.00 <br />215-41051 Workers' Ccmp. 850.00 <br />215-45230 Capital Outlay as follows: ~ <br /> a) Soccer Goals & Net $68,000.00 <br /> ($1,100.00) <br /> b) Central Prk Develop. <br /> ($50,000.00) <br /> <br />Further funding will be as follc~s for Supplement ~4: <br /> <br /> Park Surplus $17,000.00 <br /> Landfill 50,000.00 <br /> Ad valorem Tax Increase ~ <br /> Total $68,540.00 <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg and <br />Van Wagner. Voting No: Councilm~mber Schlueter. ~bsent: Councilm~mber <br />Reimann. <br /> <br />e) Adoption Of Tax Levy - <br /> <br />Council unanimously consented to dispense with the reading of the <br />resolution. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Van Wagner and seconded by Councilm~member <br />Schlueter to adopt Resolution #84-208 setting the 1985 tax levy <br />collectable in 1985 in the amount of $918,017.00. (Please refer to <br />resolution file for Resolution #84-208). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilm~ers Sorteberg and <br />Van Wagner. Voting No: Councilmember Schlueter. Absent: Councilm~r <br />Reimann. <br /> <br />Councilm~mber Sorteberg referred to lighting at Central Park and stated <br />that he doesn't think the park is used enough to warrant $50,000 to light <br />two fields. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that the Budget Ccmmittee has recommended that revenue <br />sharing be used for computer activity and dollars in the landfill trust <br />fund be used for Central Park. Lighting for Central Park would have to go <br />to bids and Council would have to approve the bid. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that the money in the landfill trust fund was <br />designated for park development; it looks like the landfill location is <br />~£easible for park develo~-nent and the property may eventually be owned <br />by the County. <br /> <br />Page 20 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />