My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/08/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/08/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:50:13 AM
Creation date
7/6/2004 9:34:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
07/08/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Johns asked if this was an addition to or was it included in the current Park Fund. <br />Ms. Lund stated it was a separate fund. She stated that there is The Park Improvement Revolving <br />Fund and this fund is only for park improvements and construction but not upkeep. She stated <br />they wanted to have a blended fund that would allow for acquisition and maintenance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds asked where the funds for maintenance came from. Ms. Lund stated they are <br />included in the general fund right now and subject to the levy limit. She stated this would allow <br />any of the upkeep coming online with the new parks, if levy limits were to remain in place; they <br />will always be contained to what is in the general fund budget for the park maintenance. This <br />would allow for a rainy day sort of fund. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated a lot of this started last year when they were struggling with some of <br />their budgeting. He stated they ran into some overages in the General Fund and they were <br />wondering how they were going to disperse some of those funds. What the Park Commission is <br />running into is they are developing the community but they do not know how they are going to <br />pay for maintenance in the long term when the opportunity for new gowth has stopped and they <br />cannot keep the new gowth happening. He stated this way, they can put some dollars into a fund <br />sort of like an endowment and they would have something they would pull off of on a yearly <br />basis. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns asked where the funds were coming from. Councilmember Elvig stated they <br />were coming from development dollars. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated they were designating a specific portion of park dollars to this <br />maintenance fund. Councilmember Strommen stated these are surplus funds at the end of the <br />year. She stated currently they do not have anything for park maintenance. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued in regards to how this idea was brought up in the City Council and how the <br />fund could be used along with possible park user fees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if they had an issue with a cap on this fund. Finance Officer Lund <br />stated she did not kmow of any cap because the State lumps all of the money together. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated he had some of his own ideas and he has been working with other cities on <br />how they maintain their parks and he thought the youth in the City needed up to date parks. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that if they are going to go forward with this and the Mayor has <br />other ideas, they should possibly discuss this. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec discussed his idea with the City Council and Park Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum stated he cannot see any difference between the current fund and the extra <br />fund for maintenance, why not let the parks use the current fund the way they want. Finance <br />Officer Lund stated the current fund is restrictive and it cannot be used for maintenance. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/June 10, 2004 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.