Laserfiche WebLink
that sound desig~ s~qineering and oper&ttonsl practices can <br /> <br />prevent such contamination. Such ~easures would include liners, <br />leachate collection systems and stor~ weter runoff control. In <br />support of this contention, Masts NanageMnt asserts that the <br />P~¢A and Metropolitan Council were mindful of soil conditions but <br />nevertheless found the site to be intrinsically suitable for a <br />landfill. The Commission finds, however, that it has not been <br />provided with sufficiently complete information on design and <br />engineering of the proposed landfill to determine that the site <br /> <br />is suitable for the proposed use. Given the presence of wet- <br />lands, the soil types, and the potential for ground and surface <br />water contamination, the Commission is unable to conclude that <br /> <br />the use of the site for a landfill will not create a significant <br />risk of surface and ground water contamination and hazard to the <br />public health, safety and welfare. <br /> <br /> b. The Hature of the l~l'oinin Land or Buildin s. <br /> <br />! <br /> <br /> 10. The South 70. The nature of adjoining land to <br /> <br />south and southwest of the South 70 is industrial, open and <br /> <br />vacant land. That portion of land located to the east a~ <br />northeast is a rural area of lo~ density population and includes <br />Sunfish Lake. The land isenediately to the north of the South 70 <br /> <br />is Anoka/Ramsey Landfill. IJune 25, 1984 testimony of Benry <br />Koch; Drawing 1~o. 1 accompanying the Plans~ aerial photographs of <br /> <br />site presented 6/25/84.) <br /> <br /> <br />