Laserfiche WebLink
hss not been trs~tc ·cctdent ·t %he <br /> ~here <br /> · <br /> <br />~he foc~y for ~s fourteen yenr ~Jfe. ~e grsn~ of · Con~l- <br />tional Use Pe~i~ would not affec~ curren~ traffic pa~erfls <br /> <br /> exist in the ·rea. Hot would the grant of the Co,~itional <br />t~e2 <br /> <br />User ~e~t significantly increase the vol~e of truck tr·ffic <br />and from the l·ndfill site, excep~ fo~ the ~en~Aa3 pro~ec~e~ <br />increase of 5t ~r year. (~ul2 3 ~ 1984 tes~i~ny of <br /> <br /> ~er.) The Co~ission fin~s tha~ ·ccess to the si~e <br /> <br /> no roadva~ u~ra~ing As needed. <br /> <br /> e. The To~al H~er of Similar Uses Within ~he City. <br /> [~0.0X6~ S~anda~ds for Consideration). <br /> <br /> 14. ~o s~ilar uses exis~ within ~he city, one xs' ~e <br /> ~ediately adjacent ~oka/~sey'mixe~ municipal ,ol}~ waste <br /> lanafill aaa the other ia a clean ~ill waste landfill wxthin <br /> ~le of the pro~sed uses. <br /> <br /> ~ether or ~ot ~e ~se ~$11 <br /> <br /> Nor <br /> <br /> ~se~ Z~~nt or ~alu <br /> ~y' Property. [170.016D tan~ar~s <br /> <br /> erationl. <br /> <br /> 15. Mr. Robert Boblett, an appraiser, was retained by the <br />City for the purpose of advising the City on whether the propose~ <br /> <br />expansion would affect property values in the vicinity of the <br />landfill. 14r. Boblett testified that the expansion to the ·outh <br />would cause a decrease in property values of ·ome adjacent <br />properties of fro~ 15 to 25 percent. Re further testified that <br /> <br /> <br />