Agenda - Council - 09/25/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I ,I I I I I I Councilmember following findings a variance: of introduced the motion to adopt the fact regarding Mr. Gene Moroz~ request for FINDINGS OF FACT 80 MR. SENE MOROZ 1) That the variance to by City Code. applicant properly applied for a Board of Adjustment construct a detached building larger than permitted ~) That the applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to the City Zoning Ordinance on September 25~ 1984. That said public hearing was properly advertised and the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. That the proposed structure is 1,350 square feet in size. 4) That the property is generally known as 17035 Driscoll Street NW and is legally described as follows: The South 200 feet of the North 1,633 feet of the West 383.01 feet of the East 799.01 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 7, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota. 5) That the subject property is less than 2.5 acres in size. 6) That such a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same district and vicinity inasmuch as there are similarly sized structures on similarly sized properties in the immediate neighborhood. 7) That the authorization of such a variance will not be of substantial detriment to the adjacent properties and will not materially impair the intent and purpose of this ordinance or the public interest. 8) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property is not so general or reoccurant in nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. 9) That the variance observes the spirit and intent ordinance and is not contrary to the public interest. of the m 10) That properly constructed, the structure the requirements of the State Building Code. will comply with m 11) That the applicant has agreed to enter into a development agreement in consideration of said variance. 12) m 13) m