My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 09/19/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2016
>
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 09/19/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:13:16 PM
Creation date
10/19/2016 11:58:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
09/19/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion by Board Member Valentine and seconded by Board Member Hiatt to recommend the <br />City Council approve the Tree Inventory and Protection Plan and the Landscape Plan. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Stodola, Board Member Valentine, Hiatt, Anderson, <br />Bernard, Covart, and Trossen. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />Chairperson Stodola stated that while the Board can continue to discuss the wetland impacts and <br />cul-de-sac size, the direction requested from the board is regarding the lot depths and whether a <br />variance would be supported. <br />Motion by Board Member Valentine and seconded by Board Member Hiatt to recommend the <br />Planning Commission deny the Variance to the lot depth standard for Lots 3 and 4, noting <br />though the Board is supportive of staff reviewing potential alternatives with the developer, which <br />would include potentially combining Lots 3 & 4 into one lot and obtaining a variance to lot depth <br />for it. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Stodola, Board Member Valentine, Hiatt, Anderson, <br />Bernard, Covart, and Trossen. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />City Planner Anderson apologized that staff did not yet have all the input from other departments <br />regarding the cul-de-sac and whether it is believed that the 26 lots will justify extension of the <br />roadway or whether it would be better to avoid the wetland impacts. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau asked for the consensus of the Board regarding the potential loss of <br />wetland if the road extension is constructed. <br />It was the consensus of the Board that the wetland should be protected to the extent possible and <br />staff should be encouraged to review the potential variance for the cul-de-sac length, as long as <br />that does not place undue burden on public works or public safety. <br />Board Member Anderson stated that perhaps the cul-de-sac be labeled as a fire lane, where <br />parking is prohibited, in order to provide additional room for fire vehicles. She noted that she <br />previously lived on a private road which was a fire lane and parking was restricted on the <br />roadway at all times. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that private roads are often narrower but noted that parking could <br />possibly be restricted on one side of the roadway if necessary. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that he lives on the longest cul-de-sac in the City, so he <br />understands the burden on plowing. He stated that although the City does not want to encourage <br />a numerous amount of the long cul-de-sacs, in some instances the length does work; noting that <br />in this situation the long cul-de-sac would prevent wetland impacts. <br />6. BOARD / STAFF INPUT <br />• Fall Recycling Day Event <br />Environmental Policy Board / September 19, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.