Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />The following projects are consistent with the Water Quality Management <br />Policy Plan and have design and/or construction costs scheduled before 1986: <br /> <br />Project Step II Step III Total <br /> <br />A1 am/Tel emetry System <br />CAB Int. Phase II <br />Lake Virginia PS & FM <br />Maple Plain PS & FM <br />Mpls. East Int. Phase II <br />Metro WWTP - Ash Landfill <br />New Projects Total <br /> <br />0.10 1.64 1.74 <br />0.131 0.131 <br />Completed 6.63 6.63 <br />O. 18 2.35 2.53 <br />Completed 26.22 26.22 <br />0.43 ?.29 7.72 <br />~.841 ~ ~r4q-~T1 <br /> <br />Approval of the projects listed above will involve $44,971,000 worth of new <br />construction (in 1984 dollars) prior to 1988. An exact allocation of these <br />costs to federal, state and metropolitan funding cannot be completed due to <br />the status of the construction grants program. <br /> <br />Council staff estimates that in excess of $35 million metropolitan funding <br />(1984 dollars) could be required. (The critical assumption is that <br />Minneapolis East Interceptor will not be grant eligible during this <br />period.) <br /> <br />The Bayport Pump Station and Force Main should be deleted from the 1984- <br />1988 Development Program because the Bayport Comprehensive Plan states the <br />City will not exceed the capacity of the Bayport Wl~TP before 1990. <br /> <br />The Stillwater WWTP expansion, approved in the 1982-1986 Development <br />Program, should be deleted. In its place the MWCC should review the <br />capacity problems associated with the final clarifiers. The MWCC should <br />return with a development program addressing this capacity problem. Delet- <br />ing this project will reduce previously approved Development Programs by <br />$13.66 million (1983 dollars). <br /> The MWCC°s share of funding of the development program and the 1984 <br /> Capital Budget is projected to cost $114.5 million from 1984 to 1989. The <br /> funding is proposed to be derived from cash on hand, investment income and <br /> new borrowing in the amount of $117.3 million. <br /> <br />The new borrowing is proposed to be for 20 years for each issue with the <br />initial interest requirements being capitalized. Each issue is <br />recommended to be in the $15 to $20 million range. <br /> <br />The combination of debt service and operating costs will increase the <br />annual cost allocations to the cities and townships by 5.3 to 7.5 percent <br />per 100,000 gallons of sewage flow. <br /> <br />SAC charges may be increased as a result of financing the development <br />program. <br /> <br />While concepts of bond issue alternatives, amendments to cost allocations <br />and changes in SAC fees are matters to be discussed at the time of review <br />of the development program, decisions should not be made until specific <br />bond issues are prepared or capital budgets are reviewed. <br /> <br />Financing for the development program improvements are not expected to <br />have negative impacts on the MIF debt indicator and debt service indicator. <br /> <br /> <br />