My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:52:28 PM
Creation date
10/26/2016 8:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1091
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Print Agenda Item http://156.142.212.178:8080/print ag memo.cfm?seq=6176&rev nut=... <br />2. Increased Code Enforcement Resources <br />The City responds to a number of nuisance complaints along key corridors ranging from outside storage to <br />building maintenance. The City is generally able to keep up with complaints regarding outside storage. <br />However, case management for lack of maintenance to buildings and structures is a time-consuming process <br />for the City and the necessary corrective actions are often times costly to property owners. This topic will <br />likely be discussed as part of the 2017 Budget preparation. Policy Direction: Does the City Council want <br />Staff to explore allocating additional resources to code enforcement efforts along key corridors either <br />through additional Staff/contracted services, redirection of existing resources (limited), or other. This can <br />also be discussed in the context of revised revenue forecasts that can be utilized for building maintenance <br />code enforcement. <br />3. Financial Incentives for Facade and Site Improvements <br />Rather than full property acquisition, the City could consider financial incentives in the form of <br />improvements to existing buildings. When considering this option, the City Council should evaluate the <br />problem attempting to be solved, and whether improvements to the building truly solves the issue, or simply <br />delays the ultimate solution. For example, is the City incentivizing an improvement that will ultimately be <br />removed for right of way acquisition? Will the overall site continue to appear blighted even with facade <br />improvements (is there still outside storage issues, other aesthetic issues, etc.)? The City Council should <br />consider the longevity of the improvements in the context of return on investment. Policy Direction: Does <br />the City Council want Staff to explore a program of financial incentives for facade or other site <br />improvements? <br />4. Increased scrutiny in leases for City -Owned Parcels <br />The City owns various parcels along the Highway 10 Corridor acquired for the purposes of Highway 10 <br />expansion purposes. In the interim, the City has chosen to lease several parcels to private entities in order to <br />retain these parcels as taxable parcels. Staff would like the City Council's thoughts on development <br />standards for these parcels and its policy stance on continuing to lease these parcels. The City Council <br />should consider this in the context of return on investment versus resources used to manage leases and the <br />quality of aesthetics of these leased properties. Policy Direction: Does the City Council want to continue to <br />lease these Highway 10 parcels? Does the City want to set a higher standard for its properties (i.e. gravel <br />parking, outside storage)? <br />5. Utilization of City Resources for voluntary clean up and improvements (Non -Violation Improvements) <br />This would apply to improvements that are not a violation of City Code. Examples include painting/graphic <br />wraps of plywood coverings of vacant structures and tree removal. This would direct resources to provide <br />visual improvements for elements that are not violations of City Code. Before moving forward with this <br />alternative, Staff would highly recommend a clear policy as to circumstances the City will consider this <br />approach to avoid allegations of unfairness to properties receiving code violation notices. Policy Direction: <br />Does the City Council want to consider the utilization of City resources to provide visual improvements to <br />structures and sites for those issues that are not a violation of City Code? <br />Timeframe: <br />30 Minutes <br />Funding Source: <br />2 of 3 8/26/2016 8:15 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.