My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:52:28 PM
Creation date
10/26/2016 8:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1091
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Strommen stated that the "low hanging fruit" should be identified from the point of the City <br />and the point of the stakeholders. She stated that perhaps number one should not be included from <br />the first discussion. <br />Councilmember Williams asked the goal of the City as that should be identified prior to reaching <br />out to the stakeholders, whether that is to improve the aesthetics or raise property values. She <br />stated that a goal should be defined and then discussions can occur between staff and the businesses <br />to gain their input. <br />Councilmember Johns stated that she would like to see the aesthetics improved. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that perhaps a statement of goal for the gateways and corridors should be <br />identified and then the question should be posed as to how the City and stakeholders can work <br />together to reach that goal. She confirmed that the goal should come from the Council. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated strategic tactic 28 referenced the development of a goal and <br />believed that staff would have the capacity to develop that goal with the stakeholders. He noted <br />that if the Council develops the goal the item would no longer be the responsibility of the public <br />engagement process. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the process that could be followed to <br />complete a draft and then bounce the conversation between the stakeholders and Council. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that the City should be careful in regard to the language used as <br />some business owners are struggling to keep their business open and it could be seen as <br />government trying to impose additional costs. He noted that perhaps some of the Commissions <br />and EDA could be brought into the discussion as well. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that it has been one year and still nothing has happened. He asked if <br />the "low hanging fruit" could be gone after while this analysis continues. <br />City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that there are some items that could be done, such as brush <br />clearing where the property owner is in agreement or addressing some of the most egregious <br />violations. He noted that these actions will push the policy question and therefore that will also <br />need to be completed. <br />Councilmember Williams stated that in her opinion if a business is leasing property from the City <br />it is their responsibility to meet all elements of the City Code and enforcement should occur when <br />necessary. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the next steps that staff will follow. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that the citizen engagement process could be one or two meetings and <br />would not need to be months long. <br />Excerpt from April 12, 2016 City Council Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.