Laserfiche WebLink
OW t hi lon: To work together ko respotibiy grow oar community, and to provide quality, cost -affective, and efckent government tet does. <br />CC Regular Session 7. 5. <br />Meeting Date: 09/13/2016 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Direction to Schedule Public Comment Period and Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the <br />Residential Rental Licensing Program. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider a process to bring an ordinance forward to amend the City's residential rental <br />licensing program. This initiative originates from the City Council's Strategic Plan. Based on an initial public <br />engagement/workshop authorized by the City Council and subsequent Staff discussion, Staff proposes the <br />following amendments to the program. <br />1. Single -Family Dwellings (detached and attached/townhome) subject to licensure (registration), but not <br />inspection. Inspections would only occur on a complaint basis. A fee of $25 would be collected. <br />2. Frequency of multi -family inspection reduced to once every three (3) years <br />a. Common Areas inspected <br />b. Portion of individual units inspected <br />In addition, the City would chart out a path for future amendments, only if necessary. These options are not being <br />recommended at this time. <br />1. If clusters of rental homes with exterior code violations presented itself, the City would consider adding an <br />exterior inspection requirement. <br />2. If clusters of interior code violations presented itself through the complaint -based system, the City would <br />consider adding interior inspections. This would be on a tiered/incentive-based approach, as outlined below. <br />As has been discussed in the past as part of this topic, the City does not believe there to be a widespread issue with <br />rental properties in Ramsey; the goal of this program is preventative in nature. However, there are isolated issues <br />and pockets of issues believed to be in existence. The amendments to the program would improve communication <br />with owners/landlords and provide an additional tool in the event the owner is unresponsive to corrective needs <br />while not creating a burdensome process both for owner and City. The proposed amendment would create a <br />program that is still much more relaxed than the City's original program for these single-family homes. <br />Background <br />The City Council previously authorized a public engagement process to gather feedback on potential amendments <br />to the rental licensing program. Letters went out to approximately 800 non -homesteaded homes believed to be rental <br />properties. The City also reached out to area real estate brokers and property management companies. Of that invite <br />list, approximately twenty (20) participated in the public comment period. The intent of that workshop was to better <br />understand the issue at hand, but not propose any amendments at that time. The City did not want to lead with <br />solutions until it better understood the issue. Staff found this to be a valuable exercise, as additional aspects of <br />renting a property were discovered that were not necessarily part of the original research. The abstract nature of the <br />