My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:52:28 PM
Creation date
10/26/2016 8:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1091
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS <br />Household Type <br />Table 7 shows the changes in the types of households in the Market Area between 1990 and <br />2000. This data is important in that different household types tend to select different housing <br />products. For example, married couple families with children are more likely to prefer single- <br />family homes. Conversely, single households are more likely to select a multifamily product, ei- <br />ther owned or rented. We discuss the changes in household types in the Market Area and the <br />implications for the development of different housing products. <br />Key points from Table 7 are: <br />• During the 1990s, the Market Area saw an increase in the number of households that are <br />married with children (1,473 households or 7%) and a greater increase in the number of <br />households that are married without children (6,551 households or 50%). This is due to cou- <br />ples waiting longer to have children and baby boomers aging into their empty nester years. <br />Married couples with children still represent the largest household type in the Market Area <br />with 38% of all households, while married couples without children is the second largest <br />household type representing 30% of households in the Market Area. <br />• In the PMA married couples with children increased by 2,029 households or 27%, while in <br />the SMA, married couples with children actually decreased by 556 households or -4%. The <br />primary reason for this is the SMA has an older population, and thus a much greater number <br />of households becoming empty -nesters. <br />• The Market Area saw significant increases in other family households (a gain of 3,222 <br />households or 50%) - which includes single -parents and unmarried couples with children. <br />Roommate households also saw an increase in the Market Area during the 1990s, with an in- <br />crease of 1,410 households (52%). This reflects a societal trend of unmarried couples living <br />together. Many of these households are candidates for affordable rental housing, particularly <br />single parents. <br />• People living alone saw the greatest rate of growth in the Market Area during the 1990s. The <br />number of people living alone grew by 5,310 households (77%). This reflects the increased <br />number of people choosing to remain single, some singles preferring not to have roommates, <br />and an increase in the number of seniors. Because they rely on a single income, these house- <br />holds living alone are strong candidates for affordable rental housing. <br />MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.