My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:52:28 PM
Creation date
10/26/2016 8:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1091
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RENTAL HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS <br />Competitive Market Area Rental Communities <br />To gauge how market rate communities may be meeting the needs of moderate -income house- <br />holds, Maxfield Research surveyed a sampling of the market rate communities (eight newer <br />communities and eight older communities) in the Market Area. Information on location, number <br />of units, vacancies, unit mix and sizes, and monthly rents are displayed in Table 20 and 21. A <br />comparison of amenities and services is presented in Table 22. <br />The following are key points from Table 20 and 21: <br />• There are 1,255 units in the surveyed newer facilities in Table 20. Of these, 45 were found <br />vacant. This translates to an overall vacancy rate of 3.86%, which is below the 5.0% level <br />considered to be market equilibrium. Market equilibrium is considered by the industry to re- <br />flect sufficient consumer choice and adequate turnover. An overall vacancy rate of 3.86% <br />generally indicates that current demand exceeds current supply, although this number only <br />represents newer rental facilities and not the market as a whole. <br />• Monthly rents among the newer surveyed units averaged $725 for one -bedroom units <br />($0.97/sq. ft.), $865 for two -bedroom units ($0.86/sq. ft.), and $1,110 for three -bedroom <br />units ($0.90/sq. ft.). It should be noted that all of the communities but three charged an addi- <br />tional fee for enclosed parking (Cutters Grove, Dellwood Estates, and Champlin Drive in- <br />clude enclosed parking in the monthly rent). Extra fees for parking ranged from $40 to $65 <br />per month. <br />• The surveyed older rental facilities consist of 1,096 units. There were 60 vacant units found <br />in these facilities. This translates to a vacancy rate of 5.5%, which is just slightly above the <br />5.0% level considered to be market equilibrium. This vacancy rate indicates that current <br />supply may be meeting current demand; however, desirability of the units could also be a <br />factor in the higher vacancy rate. <br />• Monthly rents among the older surveyed units averaged $670 for one -bedroom units <br />($0.86/sq. ft.), $776 for two -bedroom units ($0.78/sq. ft.), and $913 for three -bedroom units <br />($0.71/sq. ft.). All of the communities except for Woodland North charged an additional fee <br />for enclosed parking. Extra fees for parking ranged from $40 to $50 per month. <br />• Using the industry standard that households can afford a housing cost of 30% of their in- <br />come, a single earning approximately $30,000 could afford the average one -bedroom rent in <br />the newer apartments. Singles earning approximately $28,000 could afford one -bedroom <br />units at older apartments. Two -person households would need incomes of approximately <br />$36,000 and $32,000 to afford units at the newer and older communities, respectively. Over- <br />all, our analysis of the market rate communities finds that these units, despite being market <br />rate, provide housing to workforce households. <br />MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.