Laserfiche WebLink
24. Please describe your answer to #22. <br />develops plan <br />coverage <br />dA dequ�te <br />aashto <br />asset access <br />americans <br />draw <br />ensure concept <br />Count Response <br />existing <br />designec <br />compliance <br />0 <br />U <br />N <br />C <br />C <br />O <br />development <br />developed <br />disabilities <br />1 <br />Atthis time, Ithinkthere are more than adequate facilities. As itdevelops, I'm notsure. <br />1 Seems like reasonable coverage to me. <br />1 Stated in The COR Design Framework. <br />1 <br />The Draw and the area around it are the one landscaping feature of the original plan that remains a real assetto <br />the city. <br />1 <br />The existing COR Development Plan provides significantconsideration in the design guidelines which provide <br />for pedestrians and Americans with Disabilities. As a result these guidelines should be followed to ensure <br />proper compliance with standards such as the PROWAG design standards identified byAASHTO and others. <br />1 <br />The more that the public can have access to the COR the better the use will be <br />1 <br />The potential pedestrian areas are too spread out. It is a nice concept, butthe plans do notseem to really be <br />drawn in away that this would become a reality. <br />1 The sidewalks and trails have been designed well. <br />1 <br />This will need to be revisited once more of the COR has been developed. <br />1 all connections via walking paths seem adequate <br />28 <br />