Laserfiche WebLink
Print Agenda Item http://156.142.212.178:8080/print ag_memo.cfm?seq=6466&rev nut=... <br />CC Work Session 2. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 07/12/2016 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Findings of The COR Development Plan Policy Maker Survey <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review fmdings from the recent COR Development Plan Policy Maker <br />Survey. The intent of this survey was to review where those involved in land use policy decisions felt the <br />master plan for The COR should be headed. Over several recent Land Use Applications, it became evident <br />that there were different interpretations on what the current plan indicates and where different stakeholders <br />felt the development should be headed. The survey concept was the result of a 2015 Joint Work Session <br />between the City Council and Planning Commission. <br />Staff will present a more refined presentation at the meeting highlighting key trends. Here is a potential list <br />of key trends to consider: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />9. <br />Good Planning for Pedestrian Facilities. There is strong consensus that the City continues to do <br />well on planning for adequate pedestrian facilities. <br />Good Architectural Design. Focus on good architectural design appears to continue to be a key <br />goal. <br />Maintain Vision Area Surrounding Rail Station, With Tweaks. Vision for the downtown/station <br />area (quarter -mile around the Northstar Station) should largely stay the same in terms of design. <br />However, the mix between residential and commercial should be re-evaluated. <br />Evaluate the Vision for the Retail District. Vision of the north west retail area (Sunwood and <br />Armstrong) should be re-evaluated. While there is not a full consensus on this policy direction, there <br />are enough responses to warrant the discussion for future consideration. Responses were nearly 50/50 <br />to change the vision for this area. Evaluating the vision does not necessarily mean a plan change will <br />occur. <br />Maintain the Vision for the Office District. Vision for the south east office district should largely <br />remain the same. <br />Maintain the Vision for the Community -Oriented User. The vision for a larger community -based <br />user in The COR should be maintained. This could range from a community center to movie theater, <br />etc. <br />Evaluate the Zeolite Retail Parcel. Disclaimer: this question was worded incorrectly. The intent of <br />the question was to determine whether the City should consider a change from retail to residential <br />based on actual developer interest and challenges as a retail pad side. This question will be reviewed, <br />considered, and resolved throughout any potential amendment to the plan. However, as worded and <br />based on a response, there appears to be a desire to retain the retail vision. Evaluation does not <br />necessarily mean a plan change will occur. <br />Continue Discussion on Sign Regulations. There appears to be some hesitation in allowing 75 foot <br />tall advertising signs (result of the grade -separated interchange), while also a showing of those that <br />desire to allow for them. <br />Generally Maintain the Vision for Shared Parking Strategies. A majority of respondents <br />indicated that we should retain the vision to require shared, potentially structured parking in the <br />1 of 3 <br />8/26/2016 8:58 AM <br />