My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:52:28 PM
Creation date
10/26/2016 8:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1091
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Shryock stated that sign regulations have been discussed and if The COR is meant <br />to be the hub, then a unified look should be determined and focused on, specifically regarding <br />signage, streetscapes, and design. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that geography is also a factor in how large this market can be <br />in addition to demographics. He stated that in reference to items three and four, he would like to <br />see the appropriate density discussed to support that potential retail. He noted that, in essence, <br />Ramsey is an island because of river placement and therefore the needed density needs to be <br />determined in order to determine appropriate retail desires. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that she would like the residents and developers input to be done at one <br />time in order for residents to hear the comments of developers and developers to hear the input of <br />residents which helps both sides to see the other' s point of view. She recognized that may be <br />difficult to coordinate but believed that there would be benefit. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that once the information is reviewed, the <br />Planning Commission would need to make some policy guiding recommendations. He <br />acknowledged that additional research would be needed to review before that can take place. He <br />also liked the idea of community involvement, as gaining that knowledge will be beneficial. He <br />noted that the market study would be helpful prior to the community involvement so that <br />information can be discussed. He noted that perhaps staff can develop a plan of action and budget <br />for this course. He stated that the market study and community dialogue could be completed and <br />then reviewed and discussed by the Planning Commission and Council. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that, in the interim, if there are things in direct conflict with <br />zoning he would appreciate the Planning Commission pushing as much as possible to ensure the <br />Council is aware of those items. <br />Councilmember Kuzma referenced item ten, Architectural Review Committee, and stated that he <br />is not in favor of adding another layer to the process as staff and the Planning Commission do a <br />great job. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that perhaps additional information could come back from staff regarding <br />how the Architectural Review Committee has been used. <br />Councilmember Riley asked what would happen if the residents say they do not want any more <br />apartments. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that he is expecting that will happen but noted that is where <br />education comes into play, explaining that this has to be a mix between housing and retail and <br />eventually it will come together. <br />Mayor Strommen noted that is where it would be beneficial to have the development community <br />at the meeting. She noted that showing the original vision would also be helpful as that vision <br />contained a lot of housing. She stated that it can then be explained that if the market does not <br />Excerpt from July 12, 2016 City Council Work Session Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.