Laserfiche WebLink
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />5.01: Public Hearing: Consider Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Detached <br />Accessory Structure at 8855 176th Avenue NW; Case of Jason Norquist <br />Public Hearing <br />Vice Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 7:01 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Community Development Intern Meyers presented the staff report stating Jason and Susan <br />Norquist ('Applicants'), owners of the property located at 8855 176th Avenue NW (hereto referred <br />to as the 'Subject Property'), have applied for a Conditional Use Permit and a Variance to allow <br />for construction of an oversized accessory structure. The Applicants are proposing to construct a <br />detached accessory structure with a building footprint of 2,400 square feet, 40' x 60' and a mean <br />gable height of eighteen (18) square feet. The Applicants originally submitted a proposal for a <br />4,000 square foot, 50' x 80' detached accessory building. Please note that the site plan shows the <br />original proposal and not the updated proposal. The updated proposal anchors the building on <br />the south west corner of the original location. The Subject Property is located in the northwest <br />quadrant of the city and is zoned R-1 Residential, Rural Developing (see Image 2. Zoning Map). <br />Countryside Estates, platted in 1972, features lots ranging from 1.12 to 2.15 acres. The Subject <br />Property (see Image 1. Aerial of Subject Property (2014)) is a 1.45-acre corner lot, with 176th <br />Avenue bordering the south and Vicuna Street to the east. The northern border is shared with a <br />trail corridor. Existing structures on the Subject Property include a single family home with <br />attached garage (1,710 sf building footprint, 20 ft. in height), and a detached accessory structure <br />(624 sf, height unknown). <br />Community Development Intern Meyers explained staff had a number of concerns with the <br />original CUP request and worked with the Applicant to address them and arrive at a compromise <br />that would meet the needs of the applicant while balancing the concerns of the city. The primary <br />concern being that the scale was incompatible with the existing development pattern and <br />residential character of the area. There is also the perennial concern about the potential to introduce <br />commercial activity into a residential area. While staff supports allowing a reasonable overage in <br />building size, the original request did not demonstrate a clear justification of need. Staff <br />recommends approval of the Applicant's reduced building size of 2,400 square feet, and not the <br />full 4,000 square feet as proposed. This equates to an overage of 824 square feet when including <br />the existing accessory structure. Staff recommends approval of the variance request to allow for a <br />peak height of twenty-two (22) feet and a mean gable height of eighteen (18) feet to accommodate <br />storage of the motor home. Additionally, staff recommends that the building be serviced by a <br />second driveway, with access off of Vicuna Street. <br />Citizen Input <br />Commissioner VanScoy requested clarification on difference between the mean gable height and <br />the maximum allowable height. <br />